PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAZ vs. KEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LAZ vs. KEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Ltd (LAZ) and KeyCorp (KEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAZ achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly lower than KEY's 7.52% return. Over the past 10 years, LAZ has underperformed KEY with an annualized return of 8.71%, while KEY has yielded a comparatively higher 10.03% annualized return.


LAZ

1D
-4.51%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
-13.67%
1Y
7.45%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
4.45%
10Y*
8.71%

KEY

1D
0.42%
1M
1.74%
YTD
7.52%
6M
15.23%
1Y
38.89%
3Y*
33.73%
5Y*
4.07%
10Y*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAZ vs. KEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAZ
Lazard Ltd
-2.67%-1.64%54.83%6.92%-16.21%7.41%12.08%15.22%-25.38%36.20%
KEY
KeyCorp
7.52%26.22%25.34%-11.53%-21.69%45.92%-14.50%42.72%-24.61%12.74%

Correlation

The correlation between LAZ and KEY is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2005

0.52

The correlation between LAZ and KEY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAZ:

$4.95B

KEY:

$23.59B

EPS

LAZ:

$2.61

KEY:

$1.78

PE Ratio

LAZ:

17.77

KEY:

12.25

PS Ratio

LAZ:

1.50

KEY:

2.12

PB Ratio

LAZ:

5.62

KEY:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAZ:

$3.28B

KEY:

$11.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAZ:

$1.54B

KEY:

$7.20B

EBITDA (TTM)

LAZ:

$477.61M

KEY:

$2.51B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAZ vs. KEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAZ
LAZ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

KEY
KEY Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
KEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
KEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAZ vs. KEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Ltd (LAZ) and KeyCorp (KEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAZKEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.30

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

2.41

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.82

6.55

-5.74

LAZ vs. KEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the KEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAZ and KEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LAZKEYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

1.78

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.11

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.25

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.15

+0.03

Drawdowns

LAZ vs. KEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAZ drawdown since its inception was -62.72%, smaller than the maximum KEY drawdown of -87.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAZ and KEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAZKEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.72%

-87.08%

+24.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.39%

-17.76%

-13.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.24%

-32.21%

-12.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.24%

-65.23%

+20.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.51%

-65.23%

+5.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.52%

-4.38%

-14.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.47%

-32.89%

+9.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.38%

6.52%

+6.86%

Volatility

LAZ vs. KEY - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Ltd (LAZ) has a higher volatility of 11.34% compared to KeyCorp (KEY) at 7.36%. This indicates that LAZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAZKEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.34%

7.36%

+3.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.19%

17.24%

+12.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.21%

24.12%

+13.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.88%

38.05%

-1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.06%

39.83%

-3.77%

Dividends

LAZ vs. KEY - Dividend Comparison

LAZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than KEY's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KEY
KeyCorp
3.77%3.97%4.78%5.69%4.54%3.24%4.51%3.51%3.82%1.88%1.81%3.83%
LAZ
Lazard Ltd
4.31%4.12%3.89%5.75%5.60%4.31%4.44%5.88%8.21%5.35%6.55%5.22%

Financials

LAZ vs. KEY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lazard Ltd and KeyCorp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
779.40M
2.73B
(LAZ) Total Revenue
(KEY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LAZ vs. KEY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lazard Ltd and KeyCorp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
67.4%
Portfolio components
LAZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a gross profit of 779.40M and revenue of 779.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

KEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KeyCorp reported a gross profit of 1.84B and revenue of 2.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.4%.

LAZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported an operating income of 112.39M and revenue of 779.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

KEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KeyCorp reported an operating income of 701.00M and revenue of 2.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.

LAZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a net income of 100.92M and revenue of 779.40M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.

KEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KeyCorp reported a net income of 522.00M and revenue of 2.73B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LAZ and KEY have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAZ has higher volatility (11.34%) compared to KEY (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAZ dropped -62.72% vs KEY's -87.08%.

KEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAZ and KEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer