KEY vs. USB
KEY (KeyCorp) and USB (U.S. Bancorp) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, KEY returned 11.50%/yr vs 8.19%/yr for USB. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
KEY vs. USB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEY achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly lower than USB's 20.33% return. Over the past 10 years, KEY has outperformed USB with an annualized return of 11.50%, while USB has yielded a comparatively lower 8.19% annualized return.
KEY
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- 6M
- 7.06%
- YTD
- 11.63%
- 1Y
- 33.40%
- 3Y*
- 30.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.02%
USB
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 14.43%
- YTD
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 49.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
KEY KeyCorp | $271.41M | $252.39M | $258.10M |
USB U.S. Bancorp | $538.30M | $518.99M | $524.10M |
KEY vs. USB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEY KeyCorp | 11.63% | 26.22% | 25.34% | -11.53% | -21.69% | 45.92% | -14.50% | 42.72% | -24.61% | 12.74% |
USB U.S. Bancorp | 20.33% | 16.48% | 15.62% | 4.79% | -19.13% | 24.32% | -17.85% | 33.62% | -12.36% | 6.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEY and USB is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, KEY and USB have become more correlated (0.82) than their long-term average of 0.62, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
KEY:
$24.38B
USB:
$98.15B
KEY:
$1.87
USB:
$5.25
KEY:
12.11
USB:
11.99
KEY:
2.34
USB:
2.24
KEY:
1.40
USB:
1.62
KEY:
$10.48B
USB:
$43.74B
KEY:
$6.76B
USB:
$27.90B
KEY:
$1.90B
USB:
$10.86B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEY vs. USB — Risk / Return Rank
KEY
USB
KEY vs. USB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KeyCorp (KEY) and U.S. Bancorp (USB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KEY | USB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 2.83 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.85 | 7.25 | -2.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KEY vs. USB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEY drawdown since its inception was -87.08%, which is greater than USB's maximum drawdown of -76.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEY and USB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEY | USB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.08% | -76.08% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.76% | -16.21% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.21% | -30.63% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.23% | -52.13% | -13.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.23% | -52.13% | -13.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.84% | -2.26% | -3.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.77% | -15.58% | -17.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.49% | 6.33% | +0.16% |
Volatility
KEY vs. USB - Volatility Comparison
KeyCorp (KEY) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 6.25%. This indicates that KEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEY | USB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 6.25% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.25% | 17.34% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.78% | 22.68% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.72% | 29.62% | +8.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.66% | 30.30% | +9.36% |
Dividends
KEY vs. USB - Dividend Comparison
KEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than USB's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEY KeyCorp | 3.63% | 3.97% | 4.78% | 5.69% | 4.54% | 3.24% | 4.51% | 3.51% | 3.82% | 1.88% | 1.81% | 3.83% |
USB U.S. Bancorp | 3.30% | 3.82% | 4.14% | 4.46% | 4.31% | 3.13% | 3.61% | 2.66% | 2.93% | 2.16% | 2.08% | 2.37% |
Financials
KEY vs. USB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KeyCorp and U.S. Bancorp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KEY vs. USB - Profitability Comparison
KEY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KeyCorp reported a gross profit of 1.25B and revenue of 2.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.7%.
USB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, U.S. Bancorp reported a gross profit of 7.15B and revenue of 10.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.4%.
KEY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KeyCorp reported an operating income of -59.00M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.
USB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, U.S. Bancorp reported an operating income of 2.72B and revenue of 10.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.9%.
KEY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KeyCorp reported a net income of 509.00M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in a net margin of 24.7%.
USB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, U.S. Bancorp reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 10.92B, resulting in a net margin of 19.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KEY and USB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEY has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to USB (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEY dropped -87.08% vs USB's -76.08%.
USB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEY and USB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer