KURE vs. KBND
KURE (KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF) and KBND (KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KURE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index, while KBND is a International Government Bonds fund tracking the KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KURE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KBND.
Performance
KURE vs. KBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KURE
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- -12.23%
- YTD
- -10.68%
- 6M
- -15.54%
- 1Y
- -5.05%
- 3Y*
- -6.04%
- 5Y*
- -16.33%
- 10Y*
- —
KBND
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KURE vs. KBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | -10.68% | 24.87% | -17.83% | -17.70% | -25.43% | -16.01% | 68.97% | 34.30% | -30.07% |
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.89% | 3.13% | -6.81% | 4.41% | 9.38% | 1.25% | -4.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between KURE and KBND is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2018 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KURE vs. KBND — Risk / Return Rank
KURE
KBND
KURE vs. KBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KURE | KBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KURE | KBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | — | — |
Drawdowns
KURE vs. KBND - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KURE | KBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.11% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.07% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.13% | — | — |
Volatility
KURE vs. KBND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KURE | KBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.49% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.86% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.39% | — | — |
KURE vs. KBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
KURE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than KBND's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
KURE vs. KBND - Dividend Comparison
KURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, while KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 2.20% | 2.51% | 6.97% | 2.27% | 3.47% | 4.98% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.16% |
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | 4.70% | 4.19% | 1.29% | 0.65% | 0.05% | 14.12% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KURE and KBND have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KBND is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KBND is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KURE.
KURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.00% for KBND.
KURE is categorized as China Equities, while KBND is International Government Bonds. KURE tracks MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index, while KBND tracks KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KURE and 0.50% for KBND.
Find the right allocation for KURE and KBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer