PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KURE vs. KBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KURE vs. KBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


KURE

1D
-2.87%
1M
-12.23%
YTD
-10.68%
6M
-15.54%
1Y
-5.05%
3Y*
-6.04%
5Y*
-16.33%
10Y*

KBND

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KURE vs. KBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
-10.68%24.87%-17.83%-17.70%-25.43%-16.01%68.97%34.30%-30.07%
KBND
KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.89%3.13%-6.81%4.41%9.38%1.25%-4.42%

Correlation

The correlation between KURE and KBND is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2018

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KURE vs. KBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KURE
KURE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
KURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
KURE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
KURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
KURE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

KBND
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KURE vs. KBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KUREKBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.39

KURE vs. KBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KUREKBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

Drawdowns

KURE vs. KBND - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KUREKBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.13%

Volatility

KURE vs. KBND - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KUREKBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.39%

KURE vs. KBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

KURE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than KBND's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

KURE vs. KBND - Dividend Comparison

KURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, while KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBND
KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.40%2.20%2.51%6.97%2.27%3.47%4.98%0.00%0.04%1.16%
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
4.70%4.19%1.29%0.65%0.05%14.12%0.00%0.25%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KURE and KBND have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KBND is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KBND is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KURE.

KURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.00% for KBND.

KURE is categorized as China Equities, while KBND is International Government Bonds. KURE tracks MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index, while KBND tracks KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KURE and 0.50% for KBND.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KURE and KBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer