KRMA vs. PFM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KRMA (Global X Conscious Companies ETF) and PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - KRMA tracks the Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index while PFM tracks the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KRMA returned 10.89%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for PFM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KRMA charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PFM.

Performance

KRMA vs. PFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRMA achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than PFM's 8.18% return.

KRMA

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 6.32%
• YTD: 11.81%
• 6M: 12.13%
• 1Y: 27.87%
• 3Y*: 18.94%
• 5Y*: 10.89%
• 10Y*: —

PFM

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 7.73%
• 1Y: 19.65%
• 3Y*: 16.31%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRMA vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF	11.81%	13.98%	18.12%	22.08%	-18.96%	27.71%	17.53%	30.07%	-3.89%	22.92%
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	8.18%	14.00%	16.87%	11.40%	-6.22%	23.08%	9.53%	26.88%	-4.58%	17.65%

Correlation

The correlation between KRMA and PFM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2016	0.85

The correlation between KRMA and PFM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

KRMA vs. PFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KRMA	PFM
Technology	41.8%	24.7%
Financial Services	11.5%	18.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	4.0%
Communication Services	9.4%	1.1%
Healthcare	8.7%	14.9%
Industrials	7.1%	11.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	12.0%
Energy	2.7%	4.7%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.6%	3.0%
Utilities	0.9%	4.2%

Return for Risk

KRMA vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRMA

KRMA Risk / Return Rank: 69
KRMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
KRMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
KRMA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
KRMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
KRMA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

PFM

PFM Risk / Return Rank: 62
PFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
PFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PFM Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PFM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRMA vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KRMA	PFM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.09	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	3.07	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.38	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	2.78	+0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.76	11.28	+2.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KRMA vs. PFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the PFM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRMA and PFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KRMA	PFM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	2.09	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.79	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.53	+0.23

Drawdowns

KRMA vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRMA drawdown since its inception was -36.16%, smaller than the maximum PFM drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMA and PFM.

Drawdown Indicators

	KRMA	PFM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.16%	-53.21%	+17.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.62%	-7.09%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.41%	-14.50%	-4.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.12%	-17.81%	-8.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-0.23%	-0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.92%	-6.94%	+2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	1.75%	+0.28%

Volatility

KRMA vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison

Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 2.04%. This indicates that KRMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KRMA	PFM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	2.04%	+1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.34%	7.13%	+2.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.32%	9.47%	+2.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.19%	13.54%	+3.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.51%	15.21%	+3.30%

KRMA vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRMA has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

KRMA vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison

KRMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than PFM's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF	2.32%	2.59%	0.91%	1.16%	0.86%	1.07%	0.96%	1.52%	1.82%	1.21%	0.96%	0.00%
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	1.33%	1.41%	1.58%	1.86%	1.95%	1.69%	1.92%	1.94%	2.27%	1.70%	2.56%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KRMA and PFM in my portfolio?

KRMA and PFM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KRMA or PFM?

KRMA has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to PFM (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMA dropped -36.16% vs PFM's -53.21%.

Which ETF is better, KRMA or PFM?

On 5-year performance, KRMA leads with 10.89% vs 10.63% for PFM. On fees, KRMA is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KRMA or PFM?

Over the 5-year period, KRMA has performed better with a 10.89% return vs 10.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KRMA or PFM?

KRMA is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for PFM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KRMA or PFM?

KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 1.33% for PFM.

What is the main difference between KRMA and PFM?

KRMA tracks Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index, while PFM tracks NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for KRMA and 0.53% for PFM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KRMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.