KRMA vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KRMA (Global X Conscious Companies ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KRMA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index, while BDGS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Bridges. KRMA is passively managed, while BDGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, KRMA returned 18.94%/yr vs 14.06%/yr for BDGS. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KRMA charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

KRMA vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRMA achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 5.64% return.

KRMA

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 6.32%
• YTD: 11.81%
• 6M: 12.13%
• 1Y: 27.87%
• 3Y*: 18.94%
• 5Y*: 10.89%
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 5.64%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 13.85%
• 3Y*: 14.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRMA vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF	11.81%	13.98%	18.12%	15.21%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	5.64%	10.61%	19.07%	8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between KRMA and BDGS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023	0.72

The correlation between KRMA and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

KRMA vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KRMA	BDGS
Technology	41.8%	37.4%
Financial Services	11.5%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	10.9%
Communication Services	9.4%	16.6%
Healthcare	8.7%	7.5%
Industrials	7.1%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	4.1%
Energy	2.7%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.5%
Basic Materials	1.6%	1.5%
Utilities	0.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

KRMA vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRMA

KRMA Risk / Return Rank: 69
KRMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
KRMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
KRMA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
KRMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
KRMA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 74
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRMA vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KRMA	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.29	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	3.40	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.47	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	3.45	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.76	16.47	-2.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KRMA vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRMA and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KRMA	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	2.29	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	1.76	-1.00

Drawdowns

KRMA vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRMA drawdown since its inception was -36.16%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMA and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	KRMA	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.16%	-9.12%	-27.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.62%	-4.03%	-4.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.41%	-9.12%	-10.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-0.83%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.92%	-0.64%	-4.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	0.84%	+1.19%

Volatility

KRMA vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.14%. This indicates that KRMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KRMA	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	1.14%	+1.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.34%	4.74%	+4.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.32%	6.08%	+6.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.19%	8.21%	+8.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.51%	8.21%	+10.30%

KRMA vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRMA has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

KRMA vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

KRMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than BDGS's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.52%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF	2.32%	2.59%	0.91%	1.16%	0.86%	1.07%	0.96%	1.52%	1.82%	1.21%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KRMA and BDGS in my portfolio?

KRMA and BDGS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KRMA or BDGS?

KRMA has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to BDGS (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMA dropped -36.16% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, KRMA or BDGS?

On 3-year performance, KRMA leads with 18.94% vs 14.06% for BDGS. On fees, KRMA is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KRMA or BDGS?

Over the 3-year period, KRMA has performed better with a 18.94% return vs 14.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KRMA or BDGS?

KRMA is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KRMA or BDGS?

KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.52% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between KRMA and BDGS?

KRMA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BDGS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for KRMA and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.