PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRMA vs. SPYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KRMA vs. SPYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRMA achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than SPYX's 9.87% return. Over the past 10 years, KRMA has underperformed SPYX with an annualized return of 13.65%, while SPYX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.18% annualized return.


KRMA

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.46%
6M
8.62%
YTD
10.58%
1Y
20.02%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
13.65%

SPYX

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.49%
6M
7.84%
YTD
9.87%
1Y
21.01%
3Y*
20.05%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
15.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRMA vs. SPYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
10.58%13.98%18.12%22.08%-18.96%27.71%17.53%30.07%-3.89%22.92%
SPYX
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
9.87%17.87%25.46%26.38%-19.59%28.06%19.87%31.62%-4.26%23.25%

Correlation

The correlation between KRMA and SPYX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2016

0.90

The correlation between KRMA and SPYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

KRMA vs. SPYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KRMA
SPYX

Technology

41.0%
39.7%

Financial Services

12.5%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

9.4%
8.5%

Communication Services

8.8%
10.9%

Industrials

5.9%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
4.6%

Energy

2.4%
1.1%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.7%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.9%

Utilities

1.0%
2.2%

Technology

KRMA
41.0%
SPYX
39.7%

Financial Services

KRMA
12.5%
SPYX
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

KRMA
11.1%
SPYX
10.1%

Healthcare

KRMA
9.4%
SPYX
8.5%

Communication Services

KRMA
8.8%
SPYX
10.9%

Industrials

KRMA
5.9%
SPYX
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

KRMA
3.6%
SPYX
4.6%

Energy

KRMA
2.4%
SPYX
1.1%

Basic Materials

KRMA
2.0%
SPYX
1.7%

Real Estate

KRMA
2.0%
SPYX
1.9%

Utilities

KRMA
1.0%
SPYX
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRMA vs. SPYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRMA
KRMA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
KRMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRMA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
KRMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRMA Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYX
SPYX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRMA vs. SPYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KRMASPYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.14

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

9.38

-0.80

KRMA vs. SPYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRMA Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the SPYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRMA and SPYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KRMA vs. SPYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRMA drawdown since its inception was -36.16%, which is greater than SPYX's maximum drawdown of -32.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMA and SPYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRMASPYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.16%

-32.84%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-9.84%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-18.74%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.12%

-26.14%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.16%

-32.84%

-3.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-0.92%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-4.51%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.24%

+0.10%

Volatility

KRMA vs. SPYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) is 3.27%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that KRMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRMASPYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

4.06%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

10.24%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.72%

12.81%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.24%

17.16%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

18.00%

+0.47%

KRMA vs. SPYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRMA has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

KRMA vs. SPYX - Dividend Comparison

KRMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than SPYX's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
2.38%2.59%0.91%1.16%0.86%1.07%0.96%1.52%1.82%1.21%0.96%0.00%
SPYX
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
0.86%0.91%1.05%1.21%1.41%1.04%1.33%1.56%1.92%1.68%1.91%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, KRMA and SPYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPYX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to KRMA (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMA dropped -36.16% vs SPYX's -32.84%.

On 10-year performance, SPYX leads with 15.18% vs 13.65% for KRMA. On fees, SPYX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, KRMA has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYX has performed better with a 15.18% return vs 13.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for KRMA.

KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.86% for SPYX.

KRMA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYX is S&P 500. KRMA tracks Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index, while SPYX tracks S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for KRMA and 0.20% for SPYX.

SPYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRMA and SPYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer