KRMA vs. SPYX
KRMA (Global X Conscious Companies ETF) and SPYX (State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KRMA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index, while SPYX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KRMA returned 13.65%/yr vs 15.18%/yr for SPYX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KRMA charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SPYX.
Performance
KRMA vs. SPYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRMA achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than SPYX's 9.87% return. Over the past 10 years, KRMA has underperformed SPYX with an annualized return of 13.65%, while SPYX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.18% annualized return.
KRMA
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- YTD
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 20.02%
- 3Y*
- 16.75%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.65%
SPYX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- YTD
- 9.87%
- 1Y
- 21.01%
- 3Y*
- 20.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 15.18%
KRMA vs. SPYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF | 10.58% | 13.98% | 18.12% | 22.08% | -18.96% | 27.71% | 17.53% | 30.07% | -3.89% | 22.92% |
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 9.87% | 17.87% | 25.46% | 26.38% | -19.59% | 28.06% | 19.87% | 31.62% | -4.26% | 23.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between KRMA and SPYX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2016 | 0.90 |
The correlation between KRMA and SPYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
KRMA vs. SPYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KRMA
SPYX
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
KRMA
SPYX
Financial Services
KRMA
SPYX
Consumer Cyclical
KRMA
SPYX
Healthcare
KRMA
SPYX
Communication Services
KRMA
SPYX
Industrials
KRMA
SPYX
Consumer Defensive
KRMA
SPYX
Energy
KRMA
SPYX
Basic Materials
KRMA
SPYX
Real Estate
KRMA
SPYX
Utilities
KRMA
SPYX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRMA vs. SPYX — Risk / Return Rank
KRMA
SPYX
KRMA vs. SPYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KRMA | SPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.30 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 2.14 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.58 | 9.38 | -0.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KRMA vs. SPYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRMA drawdown since its inception was -36.16%, which is greater than SPYX's maximum drawdown of -32.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMA and SPYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRMA | SPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.16% | -32.84% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -9.84% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.41% | -18.74% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.12% | -26.14% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.16% | -32.84% | -3.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -0.92% | -1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -4.51% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.24% | +0.10% |
Volatility
KRMA vs. SPYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) is 3.27%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that KRMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KRMA | SPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 4.06% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.01% | 10.24% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 12.81% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 17.16% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 18.00% | +0.47% |
KRMA vs. SPYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KRMA has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
KRMA vs. SPYX - Dividend Comparison
KRMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than SPYX's 0.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF | 2.38% | 2.59% | 0.91% | 1.16% | 0.86% | 1.07% | 0.96% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 1.21% | 0.96% | 0.00% |
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 0.86% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.56% | 1.92% | 1.68% | 1.91% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, KRMA and SPYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPYX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to KRMA (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMA dropped -36.16% vs SPYX's -32.84%.
On 10-year performance, SPYX leads with 15.18% vs 13.65% for KRMA. On fees, SPYX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, KRMA has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYX has performed better with a 15.18% return vs 13.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for KRMA.
KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.86% for SPYX.
KRMA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYX is S&P 500. KRMA tracks Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index, while SPYX tracks S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for KRMA and 0.20% for SPYX.
SPYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KRMA and SPYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer