KRBN vs. KBA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KRBN (KraneShares Global Carbon ETF) and KBA (KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KRBN is a Commodities fund tracking the IHS Markit Global Carbon Index, while KBA is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KRBN returned 7.47%/yr vs 6.46%/yr for KBA. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KRBN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KBA.

Performance

KRBN vs. KBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRBN achieves a -5.94% return, which is significantly lower than KBA's 12.62% return.

KRBN

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 4.47%
• YTD: -5.94%
• 6M: -0.74%
• 1Y: 15.04%
• 3Y*: 3.45%
• 5Y*: 7.47%
• 10Y*: —

KBA

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 4.32%
• YTD: 12.62%
• 6M: 16.80%
• 1Y: 49.12%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 6.46%
• 10Y*: 10.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRBN vs. KBA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF	-5.94%	23.11%	-13.56%	8.01%	-12.75%	107.69%	22.60%
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF	12.62%	33.88%	15.73%	-16.77%	-3.49%	3.17%	19.50%

Correlation

The correlation between KRBN and KBA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020	0.13

KRBN vs. KBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KRBN	KBA
Financial Services	59.7%	18.5%
Basic Materials	-	10.9%
Communication Services	-	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.8%
Energy	-	3.2%
Healthcare	-	4.1%
Industrials	-	15.8%
Real Estate	-	0.6%
Technology	-	29.8%
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

KRBN vs. KBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRBN

KRBN Risk / Return Rank: 20
KRBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
KRBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
KRBN Omega Ratio Rank: 23
KRBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
KRBN Martin Ratio Rank: 16

KBA

KBA Risk / Return Rank: 85
KBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
KBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
KBA Omega Ratio Rank: 83
KBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
KBA Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRBN vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KRBN	KBA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	2.80	-2.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.13	3.80	-2.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.50	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	6.45	-5.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.58	17.29	-15.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KRBN vs. KBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRBN Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the KBA Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRBN and KBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KRBN	KBA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80	2.80	-2.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.24	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.35	+0.21

Drawdowns

KRBN vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRBN drawdown since its inception was -36.42%, smaller than the maximum KBA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRBN and KBA.

Drawdown Indicators

	KRBN	KBA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.42%	-53.24%	+16.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.98%	-7.65%	-17.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.34%	-31.23%	+3.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.42%	-39.95%	+3.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.26%	-1.25%	-13.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.14%	-25.81%	+9.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.54%	2.85%	+6.69%

Volatility

KRBN vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) is 5.13%, while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that KRBN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KRBN	KBA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.13%	7.29%	-2.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.61%	12.44%	+4.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.93%	17.65%	+1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.10%	27.20%	+0.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.63%	25.32%	+3.31%

KRBN vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRBN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

KRBN vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison

KRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than KBA's 1.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF	1.39%	1.56%	2.18%	2.34%	49.05%	9.07%	0.65%	1.53%	3.77%	1.46%	6.62%	29.08%
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF	2.02%	1.90%	7.10%	7.60%	22.91%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KRBN and KBA in my portfolio?

KRBN and KBA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KRBN or KBA?

KBA has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to KRBN (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRBN dropped -36.42% vs KBA's -53.24%.

Which ETF is better, KRBN or KBA?

On 5-year performance, KRBN leads with 7.47% vs 6.46% for KBA. On fees, KBA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, KRBN has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KRBN or KBA?

Over the 5-year period, KRBN has performed better with a 7.47% return vs 6.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KRBN or KBA?

KBA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KRBN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KRBN or KBA?

KRBN has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 1.39% for KBA.

What is the main difference between KRBN and KBA?

KRBN is categorized as Commodities, while KBA is China Equities. KRBN tracks IHS Markit Global Carbon Index, while KBA tracks MSCI China A Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KRBN and 0.60% for KBA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.