PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
KBA vs. EWT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


KBAEWT
YTD Return19.94%19.05%
1Y Return16.56%34.84%
3Y Return (Ann)-8.72%5.58%
5Y Return (Ann)2.44%14.22%
10Y Return (Ann)3.62%11.20%
Sharpe Ratio0.671.92
Sortino Ratio1.172.53
Omega Ratio1.171.33
Calmar Ratio0.361.84
Martin Ratio2.489.14
Ulcer Index7.28%4.38%
Daily Std Dev27.04%20.82%
Max Drawdown-53.24%-64.26%
Current Drawdown-33.86%-3.66%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between KBA and EWT is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

KBA vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KBA having a 19.94% return and EWT slightly lower at 19.05%. Over the past 10 years, KBA has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 3.62%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.20% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
68.37%
217.97%
KBA
EWT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KBA vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.


KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
Expense ratio chart for KBA: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for EWT: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KBA vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.67, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.67
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for KBA, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for KBA, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.36
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for KBA, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.002.48
EWT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EWT, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EWT, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.53
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EWT, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EWT, currently valued at 1.84, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.84
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EWT, currently valued at 9.14, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.009.14

KBA vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBA and EWT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.67
1.92
KBA
EWT

Dividends

KBA vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

KBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than EWT's 10.09% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
1.95%2.34%26.65%9.07%0.65%1.53%3.77%0.99%4.90%29.08%0.11%0.00%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
10.09%12.01%18.82%2.64%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%1.93%1.82%

Drawdowns

KBA vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBA drawdown since its inception was -53.24%, smaller than the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBA and EWT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-33.86%
-3.66%
KBA
EWT

Volatility

KBA vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) has a higher volatility of 17.01% compared to iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) at 5.01%. This indicates that KBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.01%
5.01%
KBA
EWT