PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
KBA vs. MCHI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KBA vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.50%
2.12%
KBA
MCHI

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with KBA having a 17.82% return and MCHI slightly higher at 17.91%. Over the past 10 years, KBA has outperformed MCHI with an annualized return of 3.29%, while MCHI has yielded a comparatively lower 1.81% annualized return.


KBA

YTD

17.82%

1M

-4.43%

6M

5.67%

1Y

14.71%

5Y (annualized)

2.35%

10Y (annualized)

3.29%

MCHI

YTD

17.91%

1M

-5.27%

6M

1.26%

1Y

13.75%

5Y (annualized)

-2.71%

10Y (annualized)

1.81%

Key characteristics


KBAMCHI
Sharpe Ratio0.560.45
Sortino Ratio1.020.87
Omega Ratio1.151.11
Calmar Ratio0.320.23
Martin Ratio1.911.35
Ulcer Index8.27%10.30%
Daily Std Dev28.43%31.04%
Max Drawdown-53.24%-62.84%
Current Drawdown-35.03%-47.34%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KBA vs. MCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.


KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
Expense ratio chart for KBA: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for MCHI: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between KBA and MCHI is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KBA vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.560.45
The chart of Sortino ratio for KBA, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.020.87
The chart of Omega ratio for KBA, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.151.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.320.23
The chart of Martin ratio for KBA, currently valued at 1.91, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.911.35
KBA
MCHI

The current KBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the MCHI Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBA and MCHI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.56
0.45
KBA
MCHI

Dividends

KBA vs. MCHI - Dividend Comparison

KBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than MCHI's 2.48% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
1.99%2.34%26.65%9.06%0.65%1.53%3.77%1.00%4.90%29.08%0.11%0.00%
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
2.48%3.49%2.16%1.04%1.04%1.45%1.60%1.56%1.66%2.76%2.35%2.37%

Drawdowns

KBA vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBA drawdown since its inception was -53.24%, smaller than the maximum MCHI drawdown of -62.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBA and MCHI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-35.03%
-47.34%
KBA
MCHI

Volatility

KBA vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) have volatilities of 9.62% and 9.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.62%
9.85%
KBA
MCHI