PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
KBA vs. MCHI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


KBAMCHI
YTD Return21.39%22.89%
1Y Return17.97%18.61%
3Y Return (Ann)-8.26%-7.72%
5Y Return (Ann)2.84%-2.16%
10Y Return (Ann)3.74%2.04%
Sharpe Ratio0.720.72
Sortino Ratio1.231.24
Omega Ratio1.181.16
Calmar Ratio0.390.36
Martin Ratio2.632.13
Ulcer Index7.37%10.19%
Daily Std Dev27.09%30.09%
Max Drawdown-53.24%-62.84%
Current Drawdown-33.06%-45.11%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between KBA and MCHI is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

KBA vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, KBA achieves a 21.39% return, which is significantly lower than MCHI's 22.89% return. Over the past 10 years, KBA has outperformed MCHI with an annualized return of 3.74%, while MCHI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.04% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.79%
11.94%
KBA
MCHI

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KBA vs. MCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.


KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
Expense ratio chart for KBA: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for MCHI: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KBA vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.72
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for KBA, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for KBA, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for KBA, currently valued at 2.63, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.002.63
MCHI
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MCHI, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.72
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MCHI, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.24
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MCHI, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MCHI, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.36
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MCHI, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.002.13

KBA vs. MCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the MCHI Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBA and MCHI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.72
0.72
KBA
MCHI

Dividends

KBA vs. MCHI - Dividend Comparison

KBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than MCHI's 2.38% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
1.93%2.34%26.65%9.07%0.65%1.53%3.77%0.99%4.90%29.08%0.11%0.00%
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
2.38%3.49%2.14%1.03%1.03%1.44%1.58%1.54%1.64%2.76%2.35%2.37%

Drawdowns

KBA vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBA drawdown since its inception was -53.24%, smaller than the maximum MCHI drawdown of -62.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBA and MCHI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-33.06%
-45.11%
KBA
MCHI

Volatility

KBA vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) has a higher volatility of 16.31% compared to iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) at 15.06%. This indicates that KBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.31%
15.06%
KBA
MCHI