PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
KBA vs. CNYA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KBA vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.90%
10.65%
KBA
CNYA

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBA achieves a 18.20% return, which is significantly higher than CNYA's 14.20% return.


KBA

YTD

18.20%

1M

-4.49%

6M

8.90%

1Y

15.29%

5Y (annualized)

2.89%

10Y (annualized)

2.93%

CNYA

YTD

14.20%

1M

-0.84%

6M

10.64%

1Y

11.58%

5Y (annualized)

2.83%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


KBACNYA
Sharpe Ratio0.490.32
Sortino Ratio0.930.70
Omega Ratio1.131.11
Calmar Ratio0.280.21
Martin Ratio1.671.04
Ulcer Index8.37%9.77%
Daily Std Dev28.37%31.69%
Max Drawdown-53.24%-49.49%
Current Drawdown-34.82%-35.44%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KBA vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KBA and CNYA have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
Expense ratio chart for KBA: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for CNYA: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between KBA and CNYA is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KBA vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.490.32
The chart of Sortino ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.000.930.70
The chart of Omega ratio for KBA, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.131.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.280.21
The chart of Martin ratio for KBA, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.671.04
KBA
CNYA

The current KBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the CNYA Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBA and CNYA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.49
0.32
KBA
CNYA

Dividends

KBA vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison

KBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than CNYA's 3.77% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
1.98%2.34%26.65%9.06%0.65%1.53%3.77%1.00%4.90%29.08%0.11%
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF
3.77%4.23%2.69%1.11%1.05%1.21%3.92%0.98%1.38%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

KBA vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBA drawdown since its inception was -53.24%, which is greater than CNYA's maximum drawdown of -49.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBA and CNYA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-34.82%
-35.44%
KBA
CNYA

Volatility

KBA vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) is 9.51%, while iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that KBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.51%
10.12%
KBA
CNYA