PortfoliosLab logo
KBA vs. ASHR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between KBA and ASHR is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

KBA vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
60.80%
68.09%
KBA
ASHR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KBA:

0.36

ASHR:

0.28

Sortino Ratio

KBA:

0.74

ASHR:

0.63

Omega Ratio

KBA:

1.11

ASHR:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

KBA:

0.25

ASHR:

0.19

Martin Ratio

KBA:

0.66

ASHR:

0.51

Ulcer Index

KBA:

16.69%

ASHR:

18.19%

Daily Std Dev

KBA:

30.52%

ASHR:

33.30%

Max Drawdown

KBA:

-53.24%

ASHR:

-51.30%

Current Drawdown

KBA:

-36.84%

ASHR:

-40.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBA achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly higher than ASHR's -2.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with KBA having a -2.76% annualized return and ASHR not far ahead at -2.66%.


KBA

YTD

-1.02%

1M

-2.76%

6M

-5.94%

1Y

7.88%

5Y*

1.92%

10Y*

-2.76%

ASHR

YTD

-2.04%

1M

-3.57%

6M

-5.72%

1Y

6.94%

5Y*

0.43%

10Y*

-2.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KBA vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for ASHR: current value is 0.65%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
ASHR: 0.65%
Expense ratio chart for KBA: current value is 0.60%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
KBA: 0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KBA vs. ASHR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KBA is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KBA is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KBA is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KBA is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KBA is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KBA is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ASHR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ASHR is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ASHR is 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ASHR is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ASHR is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ASHR is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ASHR is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KBA vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
KBA: 0.36
ASHR: 0.28
The chart of Sortino ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
KBA: 0.74
ASHR: 0.63
The chart of Omega ratio for KBA, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
KBA: 1.11
ASHR: 1.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
KBA: 0.25
ASHR: 0.19
The chart of Martin ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
KBA: 0.66
ASHR: 0.51

The current KBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is comparable to the ASHR Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBA and ASHR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.200.400.600.801.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.36
0.28
KBA
ASHR

Dividends

KBA vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

KBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than ASHR's 1.15% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
2.21%2.18%2.34%26.65%9.06%0.65%1.53%3.77%1.00%4.90%29.08%0.11%
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
1.15%1.13%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%0.27%

Drawdowns

KBA vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBA drawdown since its inception was -53.24%, roughly equal to the maximum ASHR drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBA and ASHR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-36.84%
-40.91%
KBA
ASHR

Volatility

KBA vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) have volatilities of 10.28% and 10.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
10.28%
10.44%
KBA
ASHR