PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
KBA vs. ASHR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


KBAASHR
YTD Return19.94%16.10%
1Y Return16.56%12.89%
3Y Return (Ann)-8.72%-8.86%
5Y Return (Ann)2.44%0.55%
10Y Return (Ann)3.62%4.19%
Sharpe Ratio0.670.50
Sortino Ratio1.170.92
Omega Ratio1.171.14
Calmar Ratio0.360.29
Martin Ratio2.481.74
Ulcer Index7.28%8.45%
Daily Std Dev27.04%29.47%
Max Drawdown-53.24%-51.30%
Current Drawdown-33.86%-37.44%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between KBA and ASHR is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

KBA vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, KBA achieves a 19.94% return, which is significantly higher than ASHR's 16.10% return. Over the past 10 years, KBA has underperformed ASHR with an annualized return of 3.62%, while ASHR has yielded a comparatively higher 4.19% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.47%
10.03%
KBA
ASHR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KBA vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.


ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
Expense ratio chart for ASHR: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for KBA: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KBA vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for KBA, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for KBA, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for KBA, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.36
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for KBA, currently valued at 2.43, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.002.43
ASHR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ASHR, currently valued at 0.50, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.50
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ASHR, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.92
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ASHR, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ASHR, currently valued at 0.29, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.29
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ASHR, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.001.74

KBA vs. ASHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the ASHR Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBA and ASHR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.66
0.50
KBA
ASHR

Dividends

KBA vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

KBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than ASHR's 2.13% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
1.95%2.34%26.65%9.07%0.65%1.53%3.77%0.99%4.90%29.08%0.11%
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
2.13%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%0.27%

Drawdowns

KBA vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBA drawdown since its inception was -53.24%, roughly equal to the maximum ASHR drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBA and ASHR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-33.86%
-37.44%
KBA
ASHR

Volatility

KBA vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) is 16.20%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) has a volatility of 20.27%. This indicates that KBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.20%
20.27%
KBA
ASHR