PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KQQQ vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KQQQ vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KQQQ achieves a 18.81% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.78% return.


KQQQ

1D
-0.83%
1M
7.64%
YTD
18.81%
6M
16.44%
1Y
42.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHG

1D
0.35%
1M
4.73%
YTD
6.78%
6M
6.01%
1Y
24.63%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
18.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KQQQ vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KQQQ
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
18.81%16.64%11.46%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.78%17.50%9.50%

Correlation

The correlation between KQQQ and SCHG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

0.93

The correlation between KQQQ and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

KQQQ vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KQQQ
SCHG

Technology

49.9%
46.3%

Communication Services

29.0%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

17.2%
12.7%

Industrials

2.5%
5.8%

Healthcare

1.4%
7.7%

Financial Services

1.3%
6.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.7%

Energy

-

0.8%

Real Estate

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Technology

KQQQ
49.9%
SCHG
46.3%

Communication Services

KQQQ
29.0%
SCHG
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

KQQQ
17.2%
SCHG
12.7%

Industrials

KQQQ
2.5%
SCHG
5.8%

Healthcare

KQQQ
1.4%
SCHG
7.7%

Financial Services

KQQQ
1.3%
SCHG
6.7%

Basic Materials

KQQQ

-

SCHG
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

KQQQ

-

SCHG
1.7%

Energy

KQQQ

-

SCHG
0.8%

Real Estate

KQQQ

-

SCHG
0.5%

Utilities

KQQQ

-

SCHG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KQQQ vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KQQQ
KQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
KQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
KQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
KQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KQQQ vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KQQQSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.28

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

1.51

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.16

5.04

+3.12

KQQQ vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KQQQ and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KQQQSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

1.60

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.85

+0.28

Drawdowns

KQQQ vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KQQQ drawdown since its inception was -26.15%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KQQQ and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KQQQSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.15%

-34.59%

+8.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.30%

-16.41%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-1.44%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-5.20%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.22%

4.90%

+0.32%

Volatility

KQQQ vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that KQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KQQQSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

3.61%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.32%

11.62%

+2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

15.49%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.41%

22.26%

+1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.41%

21.55%

+1.86%

KQQQ vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KQQQ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

KQQQ vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

KQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.77%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KQQQ
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
13.77%12.01%2.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, KQQQ and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KQQQ has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KQQQ dropped -26.15% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 1-year performance, KQQQ leads with 42.48% vs 24.63% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KQQQ has performed better with a 42.48% return vs 24.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KQQQ.

KQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 13.77%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

KQQQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KQQQ and 0.04% for SCHG.

KQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KQQQ and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer