KQQQ vs. SCHG
KQQQ (Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KQQQ is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Kurv, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. KQQQ is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past year, KQQQ returned 42.48% vs 24.63% for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KQQQ charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
KQQQ vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KQQQ achieves a 18.81% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.78% return.
KQQQ
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 7.64%
- YTD
- 18.81%
- 6M
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 42.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 6.78%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 24.63%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- 18.74%
KQQQ vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF | 18.81% | 16.64% | 11.46% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 6.78% | 17.50% | 9.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between KQQQ and SCHG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between KQQQ and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
KQQQ vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KQQQ
SCHG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
KQQQ
SCHG
Communication Services
KQQQ
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
KQQQ
SCHG
Industrials
KQQQ
SCHG
Healthcare
KQQQ
SCHG
Financial Services
KQQQ
SCHG
Basic Materials
KQQQ
-
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
KQQQ
-
SCHG
Energy
KQQQ
-
SCHG
Real Estate
KQQQ
-
SCHG
Utilities
KQQQ
-
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KQQQ vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
KQQQ
SCHG
KQQQ vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KQQQ | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.28 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 1.51 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.16 | 5.04 | +3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KQQQ | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 1.60 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.85 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
KQQQ vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KQQQ drawdown since its inception was -26.15%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KQQQ and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KQQQ | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.15% | -34.59% | +8.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.30% | -16.41% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -1.44% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -5.20% | +0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.22% | 4.90% | +0.32% |
Volatility
KQQQ vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that KQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KQQQ | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 3.61% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.32% | 11.62% | +2.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 15.49% | +2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 22.26% | +1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 21.55% | +1.86% |
KQQQ vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
KQQQ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
KQQQ vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
KQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.77%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF | 13.77% | 12.01% | 2.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, KQQQ and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
KQQQ has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KQQQ dropped -26.15% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 1-year performance, KQQQ leads with 42.48% vs 24.63% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KQQQ has performed better with a 42.48% return vs 24.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KQQQ.
KQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 13.77%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.
KQQQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KQQQ and 0.04% for SCHG.
KQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KQQQ and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer