KQQQ vs. QQQI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

KQQQ (Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KQQQ is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Kurv, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KQQQ returned 23.23% vs 17.94% for QQQI. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. KQQQ charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

KQQQ vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KQQQ achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 6.90% return.

KQQQ

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: -2.71%
• 6M: 11.28%
• YTD: 11.27%
• 1Y: 23.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.07%

QQQI

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -3.08%
• 6M: 5.69%
• YTD: 6.90%
• 1Y: 17.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	$1.43M	$1.22M	$1.57M
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	$341.25M	$334.46M	$358.36M

KQQQ vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	11.27%	16.64%	11.50%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	6.90%	18.62%	8.17%

Correlation

The correlation between KQQQ and QQQI is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.93

The correlation between KQQQ and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

KQQQ vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KQQQ	QQQI
Technology	52.7%	59.9%
Communication Services	27.5%	12.1%
Consumer Cyclical	16.9%	10.0%
Industrials	2.8%	4.3%
Financial Services	1.3%	0.2%
Healthcare	0.1%	3.7%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.5%
Energy	-	0.5%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

KQQQ vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KQQQ

KQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 37
KQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
KQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
KQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 37
KQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
KQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 36

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 43
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 39
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KQQQ vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KQQQ	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	0.98	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	1.42	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.18	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	1.67	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.53	6.03	-2.50

KQQQ vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KQQQ and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KQQQ vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KQQQ drawdown since its inception was -26.15%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KQQQ and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	KQQQ	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.15%	-20.00%	-6.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.30%	-9.61%	-7.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.61%	-5.92%	-1.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.76%	-2.27%	-2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.71%	2.67%	+3.04%

Volatility

KQQQ vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) have volatilities of 6.51% and 6.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KQQQ	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	6.53%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.77%	13.66%	+3.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.31%	16.35%	+3.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.60%	17.75%	+5.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.60%	17.75%	+5.85%

KQQQ vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

KQQQ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

KQQQ vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

KQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.12%, more than QQQI's 14.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	16.12%	12.01%	2.48%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	14.38%	13.82%	12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KQQQ and QQQI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, KQQQ and QQQI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, KQQQ or QQQI?

QQQI has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to KQQQ (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KQQQ dropped -26.15% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which ETF is better, KQQQ or QQQI?

On 1-year performance, KQQQ leads with 23.23% vs 17.94% for QQQI. On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KQQQ or QQQI?

Over the 1-year period, KQQQ has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 17.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KQQQ or QQQI?

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KQQQ or QQQI?

KQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 16.12%, compared with 14.38% for QQQI.

What is the main difference between KQQQ and QQQI?

KQQQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KQQQ and 0.68% for QQQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.