KQQQ vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

KQQQ (Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KQQQ is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Kurv, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. KQQQ is actively managed, while QQQM is passively managed. Over the past year, KQQQ returned 39.20% vs 41.06% for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KQQQ charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

KQQQ vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KQQQ achieves a 16.99% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 20.46% return.

KQQQ

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 16.99%
• 6M: 16.94%
• 1Y: 39.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 2.98%
• YTD: 20.46%
• 6M: 19.51%
• 1Y: 41.06%
• 3Y*: 27.57%
• 5Y*: 17.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KQQQ vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	16.99%	16.64%	11.50%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	20.46%	20.85%	6.34%

Correlation

The correlation between KQQQ and QQQM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.94

The correlation between KQQQ and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

KQQQ vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KQQQ	QQQM
Technology	50.8%	58.7%
Communication Services	28.7%	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	17.9%	11.4%
Industrials	2.6%	2.6%
Financial Services	1.3%	0.2%
Healthcare	0.1%	3.7%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.4%
Energy	-	0.5%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

KQQQ vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KQQQ

KQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
KQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
KQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
KQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
KQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
KQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 46

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 72
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KQQQ vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KQQQ	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	2.36	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	3.05	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.41	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	3.45	-1.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.40	12.82	-5.41

KQQQ vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KQQQ and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KQQQ vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KQQQ drawdown since its inception was -26.15%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KQQQ and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	KQQQ	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.15%	-35.04%	+8.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.30%	-11.96%	-5.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.86%	-0.97%	-1.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.69%	-8.20%	+3.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.31%	3.21%	+2.10%

Volatility

KQQQ vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) is 7.69%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that KQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KQQQ	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.69%	8.28%	-0.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.62%	14.05%	+1.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.32%	17.55%	+1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.66%	22.48%	+1.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.66%	22.26%	+1.40%

KQQQ vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

KQQQ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

KQQQ vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

KQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.98%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	13.98%	12.01%	2.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.53%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KQQQ and QQQM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, KQQQ and QQQM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, KQQQ or QQQM?

QQQM has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to KQQQ (7.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KQQQ dropped -26.15% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which ETF is better, KQQQ or QQQM?

On 1-year performance, QQQM leads with 41.06% vs 39.20% for KQQQ. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, KQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KQQQ or QQQM?

Over the 1-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 41.06% return vs 39.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KQQQ or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KQQQ or QQQM?

KQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 13.98%, compared with 0.53% for QQQM.

What is the main difference between KQQQ and QQQM?

KQQQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KQQQ and 0.15% for QQQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.