PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KQQQ vs. QDVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KQQQ vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KQQQ vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KQQQ
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
-8.12%16.64%13.29%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
-4.93%20.16%11.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KQQQ achieves a -8.12% return, which is significantly lower than QDVO's -4.93% return.


KQQQ

1D
2.11%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
-8.12%
6M
-7.83%
1Y
22.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDVO

1D
0.86%
1M
-2.96%
YTD
-4.93%
6M
-2.40%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KQQQ vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KQQQ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KQQQ vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KQQQ
KQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
KQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
KQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
KQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
KQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVO
QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KQQQ vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KQQQQDVODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

1.14

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.48

1.79

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

2.13

-0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.40

7.94

-3.54

KQQQ vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the QDVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KQQQ and QDVO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KQQQQDVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

1.14

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.92

-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between KQQQ and QDVO is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

KQQQ vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

KQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.58%, more than QDVO's 11.17% yield.


TTM20252024
KQQQ
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
16.58%12.01%2.48%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
11.17%9.92%2.79%

Drawdowns

KQQQ vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KQQQ drawdown since its inception was -26.15%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KQQQ and QDVO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KQQQQDVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.15%

-17.75%

-8.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.30%

-10.24%

-7.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.51%

-6.70%

-5.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-2.51%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.29%

2.75%

+2.54%

Volatility

KQQQ vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) has a higher volatility of 7.32% compared to Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) at 5.38%. This indicates that KQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KQQQQDVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.32%

5.38%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.47%

9.78%

+3.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.53%

18.61%

+4.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.57%

18.01%

+5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.57%

18.01%

+5.56%