KQQQ vs. GINN

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

KQQQ (Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. KQQQ is actively managed, while GINN is passively managed. Over the past year, KQQQ returned 30.24% vs 17.26% for GINN. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KQQQ charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.

Performance

KQQQ vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KQQQ achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 4.77% return.

KQQQ

• 1D: -1.78%
• 1M: -3.45%
• YTD: 12.10%
• 6M: 10.72%
• 1Y: 30.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GINN

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -2.16%
• YTD: 4.77%
• 6M: 3.25%
• 1Y: 17.26%
• 3Y*: 18.20%
• 5Y*: 5.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KQQQ vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	12.10%	16.64%	11.50%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	4.77%	20.25%	6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between KQQQ and GINN is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.77

The correlation between KQQQ and GINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

KQQQ vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KQQQ	GINN
Technology	50.8%	32.6%
Communication Services	28.7%	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	17.9%	12.7%
Industrials	2.6%	4.7%
Financial Services	1.3%	12.4%
Healthcare	0.1%	20.6%
Basic Materials	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.8%
Energy	-	1.7%
Real Estate	-	0.6%
Utilities	-	1.7%

Return for Risk

KQQQ vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KQQQ

KQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 44
KQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
KQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
KQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 46
KQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
KQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 39

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 31
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 30
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KQQQ vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KQQQ	GINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	1.06	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	1.53	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.19	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.76	1.31	+0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.68	4.60	+1.08

KQQQ vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KQQQ and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KQQQ vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KQQQ drawdown since its inception was -26.15%, smaller than the maximum GINN drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KQQQ and GINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	KQQQ	GINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.15%	-41.25%	+15.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.30%	-13.18%	-4.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.92%	-5.13%	-1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.69%	-13.27%	+8.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.34%	3.76%	+1.58%

Volatility

KQQQ vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 5.76%. This indicates that KQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KQQQ	GINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.23%	5.76%	+2.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.86%	12.88%	+2.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.53%	16.55%	+2.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.72%	21.43%	+2.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.72%	21.06%	+2.66%

KQQQ vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KQQQ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

KQQQ vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

KQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.59%, more than GINN's 1.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.20%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	14.59%	12.01%	2.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KQQQ and GINN in my portfolio?

KQQQ and GINN have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KQQQ or GINN?

KQQQ has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to GINN (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KQQQ dropped -26.15% vs GINN's -41.25%.

Which ETF is better, KQQQ or GINN?

On 1-year performance, KQQQ leads with 30.24% vs 17.26% for GINN. On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 5.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KQQQ or GINN?

Over the 1-year period, KQQQ has performed better with a 30.24% return vs 17.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KQQQ or GINN?

GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KQQQ or GINN?

KQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 14.59%, compared with 1.20% for GINN.

What is the main difference between KQQQ and GINN?

They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KQQQ and 0.50% for GINN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.