KOMP vs. GINN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

KOMP (SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KOMP is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index, while GINN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KOMP returned 2.00%/yr vs 6.09%/yr for GINN. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. KOMP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.

Performance

KOMP vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOMP achieves a 10.19% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 7.67% return.

KOMP

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -5.47%
• 6M: 4.39%
• YTD: 10.19%
• 1Y: 21.97%
• 3Y*: 13.12%
• 5Y*: 2.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.11%

GINN

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -0.47%
• 6M: 5.92%
• YTD: 7.67%
• 1Y: 19.29%
• 3Y*: 16.60%
• 5Y*: 6.09%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	$126.11K	$121.47K	$212.21K
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	$3.68M	$4.72M	$6.88M

KOMP vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	10.19%	19.74%	10.05%	20.09%	-32.21%	3.67%	21.18%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	7.67%	20.25%	18.71%	29.94%	-32.40%	10.39%	8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between KOMP and GINN is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020	0.91

The correlation between KOMP and GINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

KOMP vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KOMP	GINN
Technology	38.9%	33.0%
Industrials	25.7%	5.0%
Healthcare	12.9%	22.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.0%	12.2%
Communication Services	4.2%	9.6%
Financial Services	4.0%	12.5%
Utilities	3.6%	1.7%
Basic Materials	3.0%	0.1%
Energy	1.3%	1.3%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	1.7%
Real Estate	-	0.6%

Return for Risk

KOMP vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KOMP

KOMP Risk / Return Rank: 33
KOMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
KOMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
KOMP Omega Ratio Rank: 30
KOMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
KOMP Martin Ratio Rank: 34

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 40
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 39
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KOMP vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KOMP	GINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	1.03	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	1.50	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.18	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	1.30	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.28	4.43	-1.16

KOMP vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOMP Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOMP and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KOMP vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOMP drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than GINN's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOMP and GINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	KOMP	GINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.06%	-41.25%	-8.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.57%	-13.18%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.93%	-22.25%	-2.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.38%	-41.25%	-4.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.68%	-2.51%	-10.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.42%	-13.09%	-8.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.01%	3.87%	+2.14%

Volatility

KOMP vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 3.85%. This indicates that KOMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KOMP	GINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.89%	3.85%	+4.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.56%	12.97%	+7.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.79%	16.66%	+9.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.22%	21.43%	+3.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.12%	20.94%	+6.18%

KOMP vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOMP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

KOMP vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

KOMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than GINN's 1.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.17%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	1.58%	1.84%	1.04%	1.27%	1.47%	1.44%	0.69%	0.81%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KOMP and GINN in my portfolio?

KOMP and GINN have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KOMP or GINN?

KOMP has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to GINN (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOMP dropped -50.06% vs GINN's -41.25%.

Which ETF is better, KOMP or GINN?

On 5-year performance, GINN leads with 6.09% vs 2.00% for KOMP. On fees, KOMP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KOMP or GINN?

Over the 5-year period, GINN has performed better with a 6.09% return vs 2.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KOMP or GINN?

KOMP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KOMP or GINN?

KOMP has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.17% for GINN.

What is the main difference between KOMP and GINN?

KOMP is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while GINN is Technology Equities. KOMP tracks S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for KOMP and 0.50% for GINN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.