KOMP vs. GINN
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN).
KOMP and GINN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KOMP is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2018. GINN is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2020. Both KOMP and GINN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KOMP or GINN.
Key characteristics
| KOMP | GINN | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.41% | 22.07% |
| 1Y Return | 42.19% | 38.90% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -5.86% | 0.42% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.14 | 2.62 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.91 | 3.43 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.35 | 1.45 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.94 | 1.47 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.69 | 15.24 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.53% | 2.67% |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.48% | 15.53% |
| Max Drawdown | -50.06% | -41.25% |
| Current Drawdown | -24.45% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between KOMP and GINN is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
KOMP vs. GINN - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, KOMP achieves a 17.41% return, which is significantly lower than GINN's 22.07% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KOMP vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison
KOMP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KOMP vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KOMP vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison
KOMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than GINN's 0.83% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF | 1.04% | 1.27% | 1.47% | 1.44% | 0.69% | 0.81% | 0.13% |
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 0.83% | 1.01% | 0.69% | 0.67% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KOMP vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KOMP drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than GINN's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOMP and GINN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KOMP vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 4.35%. This indicates that KOMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.