GINN vs. ARKW
GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) and ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GINN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK. GINN is passively managed, while ARKW is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GINN returned 6.09%/yr vs -1.16%/yr for ARKW. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GINN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ARKW.
Performance
GINN vs. ARKW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly higher than ARKW's -7.37% return.
GINN
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- YTD
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 19.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.09%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.69%
ARKW
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- -7.37%
- 1Y
- -7.47%
- 3Y*
- 27.92%
- 5Y*
- -1.16%
- 10Y*
- 21.15%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.60M | $12.21M | $13.95M | |
| $126.11K | $121.47K | $212.21K |
GINN vs. ARKW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 7.67% | 20.25% | 18.71% | 29.94% | -32.40% | 10.39% | 8.08% |
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -7.37% | 38.93% | 42.27% | 96.89% | -67.49% | -18.85% | 18.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between GINN and ARKW is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between GINN and ARKW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
GINN vs. ARKW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GINN
ARKW
Technology
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
GINN
ARKW
Healthcare
GINN
ARKW
-
Financial Services
GINN
ARKW
Consumer Cyclical
GINN
ARKW
Communication Services
GINN
ARKW
Industrials
GINN
ARKW
Consumer Defensive
GINN
ARKW
-
Utilities
GINN
ARKW
-
Energy
GINN
ARKW
-
Real Estate
GINN
ARKW
-
Basic Materials
GINN
ARKW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GINN vs. ARKW — Risk / Return Rank
GINN
ARKW
GINN vs. ARKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GINN | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.97 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | -0.33 | +1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | -0.62 | +5.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GINN vs. ARKW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, smaller than the maximum ARKW drawdown of -80.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and ARKW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GINN | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.25% | -80.52% | +39.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.18% | -36.21% | +23.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.25% | -36.21% | +13.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.25% | -77.36% | +36.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -25.76% | +23.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.09% | -23.95% | +10.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 19.34% | -15.47% |
Volatility
GINN vs. ARKW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) is 3.85%, while ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that GINN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GINN | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 8.84% | -4.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 25.86% | -12.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.66% | 33.57% | -16.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 43.76% | -22.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 37.82% | -16.88% |
GINN vs. ARKW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKW's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
GINN vs. ARKW - Dividend Comparison
GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than ARKW's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.72% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 1.17% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.01% | 0.69% | 0.67% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GINN and ARKW have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKW has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to GINN (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINN dropped -41.25% vs ARKW's -80.52%.
On 5-year performance, GINN leads with 6.09% vs -1.16% for ARKW. On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GINN has performed better with a 6.09% return vs -1.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.
ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 1.17% for GINN.
GINN is categorized as Technology Equities, while ARKW is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GINN and 0.76% for ARKW.
GINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GINN and ARKW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer