PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KOMP vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KOMP vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with KOMP having a 10.19% return and VTI slightly higher at 10.49%.


KOMP

1D
-0.09%
1M
-5.47%
6M
4.39%
YTD
10.19%
1Y
21.97%
3Y*
13.12%
5Y*
2.00%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.11%

VTI

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.15%
6M
8.77%
YTD
10.49%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
14.63%
ALL TIME*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.68M$4.72M$6.88M
$1.06B$1.16B$1.24B

KOMP vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KOMP
SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
10.19%19.74%10.05%20.09%-32.21%3.67%61.28%37.12%-10.32%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
10.49%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between KOMP and VTI is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2018

0.87

The correlation between KOMP and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

KOMP vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KOMP
VTI

Technology

38.9%
36.1%

Industrials

25.7%
10.2%

Healthcare

12.9%
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
9.4%

Communication Services

4.2%
9.1%

Financial Services

4.0%
11.8%

Utilities

3.6%
2.2%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.9%

Energy

1.3%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
4.3%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Technology

KOMP
38.9%
VTI
36.1%

Industrials

KOMP
25.7%
VTI
10.2%

Healthcare

KOMP
12.9%
VTI
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

KOMP
6.0%
VTI
9.4%

Communication Services

KOMP
4.2%
VTI
9.1%

Financial Services

KOMP
4.0%
VTI
11.8%

Utilities

KOMP
3.6%
VTI
2.2%

Basic Materials

KOMP
3.0%
VTI
1.9%

Energy

KOMP
1.3%
VTI
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

KOMP
0.5%
VTI
4.3%

Real Estate

KOMP

-

VTI
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KOMP vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KOMP
KOMP Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
KOMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOMP Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
KOMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOMP Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KOMP vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KOMPVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.27

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

2.23

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.28

9.62

-6.34

KOMP vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOMP Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOMP and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KOMP vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOMP drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOMP and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KOMPVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-55.45%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.57%

-8.92%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-19.30%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.38%

-25.36%

-20.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.68%

-1.36%

-11.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.42%

-7.99%

-13.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.01%

2.07%

+3.94%

Volatility

KOMP vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.46%. This indicates that KOMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KOMPVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.89%

3.46%

+4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.56%

10.24%

+10.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.79%

13.10%

+12.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.22%

17.51%

+7.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.12%

18.30%

+8.82%

KOMP vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOMP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

KOMP vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

KOMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than VTI's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KOMP
SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
1.58%1.84%1.04%1.27%1.47%1.44%0.69%0.81%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.06%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


KOMP and VTI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KOMP has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to VTI (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOMP dropped -50.06% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 11.74% vs 2.00% for KOMP. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 11.74% return vs 2.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for KOMP.

KOMP has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.06% for VTI.

KOMP is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. KOMP tracks S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for KOMP and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KOMP and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer