PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KOMP vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KOMP vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOMP achieves a 15.70% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 1.13% return.


KOMP

1D
-2.64%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
15.70%
6M
12.72%
1Y
34.68%
3Y*
18.75%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*

BOTZ

1D
-4.41%
1M
-9.06%
YTD
1.13%
6M
0.29%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOMP vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KOMP
SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
15.70%19.74%10.05%20.09%-32.21%3.67%61.28%37.12%-10.32%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
1.13%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-16.30%

Correlation

The correlation between KOMP and BOTZ is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2018

0.83

The correlation between KOMP and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

KOMP vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KOMP
BOTZ

Technology

35.5%
31.8%

Industrials

27.7%
49.3%

Healthcare

11.1%
8.0%

Financial Services

6.2%
0.9%

Communication Services

5.3%
4.4%

Utilities

4.8%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.3%
6.4%

Basic Materials

2.5%
0.0%

Energy

2.4%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

KOMP
35.5%
BOTZ
31.8%

Industrials

KOMP
27.7%
BOTZ
49.3%

Healthcare

KOMP
11.1%
BOTZ
8.0%

Financial Services

KOMP
6.2%
BOTZ
0.9%

Communication Services

KOMP
5.3%
BOTZ
4.4%

Utilities

KOMP
4.8%
BOTZ
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

KOMP
4.3%
BOTZ
6.4%

Basic Materials

KOMP
2.5%
BOTZ
0.0%

Energy

KOMP
2.4%
BOTZ
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

KOMP
0.2%
BOTZ
0.0%

Real Estate

KOMP

-

BOTZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KOMP vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOMP
KOMP Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
KOMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOMP Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
KOMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOMP Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOMP vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KOMPBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.15

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

1.04

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.97

3.34

+3.63

KOMP vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOMP Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOMP and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KOMP vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOMP drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOMP and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KOMPBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-55.54%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-19.34%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-29.02%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.38%

-55.54%

+10.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.32%

-11.99%

+3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.58%

-18.27%

-3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.99%

6.01%

-1.02%

Volatility

KOMP vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) has a higher volatility of 10.71% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 10.19%. This indicates that KOMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KOMPBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.71%

10.19%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.81%

20.13%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.71%

25.54%

-0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.08%

27.03%

-1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.13%

25.83%

+1.30%

KOMP vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOMP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

KOMP vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

KOMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than BOTZ's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.65%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
KOMP
SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
1.51%1.84%1.04%1.27%1.47%1.44%0.69%0.81%0.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KOMP and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KOMP has higher volatility (10.71%) compared to BOTZ (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOMP dropped -50.06% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

On 5-year performance, KOMP leads with 1.98% vs 1.10% for BOTZ. On fees, KOMP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 10.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KOMP has performed better with a 1.98% return vs 1.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KOMP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

KOMP has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.65% for BOTZ.

KOMP is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. KOMP tracks S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for KOMP and 0.68% for BOTZ.

KOMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KOMP and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer