KMB vs. EMR
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and EMR (Emerson Electric Co.) are both stocks. KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while EMR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 0.29%/yr vs 13.21%/yr for EMR. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. EMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a -4.92% return, which is significantly lower than EMR's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed EMR with an annualized return of 0.29%, while EMR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.21% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- -4.92%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- -29.05%
- 3Y*
- -7.87%
- 5Y*
- -2.82%
- 10Y*
- 0.29%
EMR
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 18.92%
- 3Y*
- 21.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
KMB vs. EMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | -4.92% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 6.99% | 8.92% | 29.73% | 3.75% | 5.74% | 18.19% | 8.61% | 31.53% | -11.87% | 29.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and EMR is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1984 | 0.29 |
The correlation between KMB and EMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KMB:
$31.57B
EMR:
$79.32B
KMB:
$5.93
EMR:
$4.33
KMB:
15.99
EMR:
32.52
KMB:
2.76
EMR:
11.56
KMB:
1.91
EMR:
4.34
KMB:
17.58
EMR:
3.90
KMB:
$16.54B
EMR:
$18.32B
KMB:
$5.93B
EMR:
$7.22B
KMB:
$3.07B
EMR:
$3.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. EMR — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
EMR
KMB vs. EMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KMB | EMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.13 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 0.81 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | 1.79 | -3.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KMB | EMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.17 | 0.64 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.36 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 | 0.46 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.34 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
KMB vs. EMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum EMR drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and EMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | EMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -59.05% | +22.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.79% | -23.45% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -29.62% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -29.62% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -50.77% | +16.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.85% | -12.18% | -20.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -14.11% | +5.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.81% | 10.59% | +9.22% |
Volatility
KMB vs. EMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 6.43%, while Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | EMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 10.89% | -4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.33% | 24.58% | -9.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.88% | 29.89% | -5.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.95% | 27.22% | -7.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 29.09% | -8.13% |
Dividends
KMB vs. EMR - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, more than EMR's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 1.56% | 1.61% | 1.70% | 2.14% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.49% | 2.58% | 3.26% | 2.76% | 3.42% | 3.94% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 5.34% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
KMB vs. EMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Emerson Electric Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. EMR - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
EMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emerson Electric Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
EMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emerson Electric Co. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
EMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emerson Electric Co. reported a net income of 618.00M and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and EMR have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMR has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to KMB (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs EMR's -59.05%.
EMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and EMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer