KLAC vs. CLMB
KLAC (KLA Corporation) and CLMB (Climb Global Solutions) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — KLAC in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, CLMB in Electronics & Computer Distribution. Over the past 10 years, KLAC returned 42.36%/yr vs 20.89%/yr for CLMB. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KLAC vs. CLMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLAC achieves a 73.94% return, which is significantly higher than CLMB's -7.50% return. Over the past 10 years, KLAC has outperformed CLMB with an annualized return of 42.36%, while CLMB has yielded a comparatively lower 20.89% annualized return.
KLAC
- 1D
- 9.27%
- 1M
- 12.92%
- YTD
- 73.94%
- 6M
- 72.59%
- 1Y
- 162.58%
- 3Y*
- 66.83%
- 5Y*
- 47.83%
- 10Y*
- 42.36%
CLMB
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 18.14%
- YTD
- -7.50%
- 6M
- -14.10%
- 1Y
- -9.53%
- 3Y*
- 27.04%
- 5Y*
- 29.09%
- 10Y*
- 20.89%
KLAC vs. CLMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLAC KLA Corporation | 73.94% | 94.48% | 9.36% | 56.05% | -11.20% | 68.05% | 47.94% | 103.99% | -12.49% | 36.80% |
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | -7.50% | -18.40% | 133.60% | 76.59% | -8.29% | 88.47% | 22.14% | 70.90% | -37.08% | -7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLAC and CLMB is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1995 | 0.11 |
The correlation between KLAC and CLMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KLAC:
$278.42B
CLMB:
$432.99M
KLAC:
$35.29
CLMB:
$1.16
KLAC:
59.74
CLMB:
20.57
KLAC:
2.23
CLMB:
0.87
KLAC:
21.30
CLMB:
0.62
KLAC:
47.75
CLMB:
3.66
KLAC:
$13.10B
CLMB:
$696.85M
KLAC:
$8.09B
CLMB:
$108.37M
KLAC:
$5.77B
CLMB:
$35.93M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLAC vs. CLMB — Risk / Return Rank
KLAC
CLMB
KLAC vs. CLMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KLA Corporation (KLAC) and Climb Global Solutions (CLMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KLAC | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.01 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.30 | -0.18 | +7.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.22 | -0.37 | +23.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KLAC | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.43 | -0.18 | +3.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 0.64 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.02 | 0.51 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.22 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
KLAC vs. CLMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLAC drawdown since its inception was -83.74%, smaller than the maximum CLMB drawdown of -89.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLAC and CLMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLAC | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.74% | -89.12% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.41% | -53.40% | +30.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.95% | -53.40% | +18.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.28% | -53.40% | +13.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.28% | -53.40% | +13.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -33.59% | +32.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.34% | -32.23% | +2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.03% | 25.81% | -18.78% |
Volatility
KLAC vs. CLMB - Volatility Comparison
KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a higher volatility of 19.61% compared to Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) at 10.32%. This indicates that KLAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLAC | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.61% | 10.32% | +9.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.06% | 40.72% | -0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.74% | 52.14% | -4.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.46% | 45.76% | -2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.64% | 40.89% | +0.75% |
Dividends
KLAC vs. CLMB - Dividend Comparison
KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than CLMB's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | 0.36% | 0.66% | 0.67% | 1.24% | 2.16% | 1.94% | 3.56% | 4.20% | 6.80% | 4.07% | 3.64% | 3.71% |
KLAC KLA Corporation | 0.38% | 0.61% | 0.96% | 0.92% | 1.25% | 0.91% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 3.17% | 2.15% | 2.67% | 2.94% |
Financials
KLAC vs. CLMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KLA Corporation and Climb Global Solutions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KLAC vs. CLMB - Profitability Comparison
KLAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KLA Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.09B and revenue of 3.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.
CLMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a gross profit of 26.50M and revenue of 182.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.5%.
KLAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KLA Corporation reported an operating income of 1.41B and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.2%.
CLMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported an operating income of 3.88M and revenue of 182.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.
KLAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KLA Corporation reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in a net margin of 35.2%.
CLMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a net income of 3.33M and revenue of 182.38M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KLAC and CLMB have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KLAC has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to CLMB (10.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLAC dropped -83.74% vs CLMB's -89.12%.
KLAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KLAC and CLMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer