KLAC vs. ASML.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about KLA Corporation (KLAC) and ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS).
Performance
KLAC vs. ASML.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KLAC vs. ASML.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLAC KLA Corporation | 21.34% | 94.48% | 9.36% | 56.05% | -11.20% | 68.05% | 47.94% | 103.99% | -12.49% | 36.80% |
ASML.AS ASML Holding NV | 19.85% | 55.50% | -5.84% | 40.98% | -32.17% | 66.56% | 65.57% | 91.52% | -9.12% | 56.88% |
Different Trading Currencies
KLAC is traded in USD, while ASML.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ASML.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLAC achieves a 21.34% return, which is significantly higher than ASML.AS's 19.85% return. Over the past 10 years, KLAC has outperformed ASML.AS with an annualized return of 37.36%, while ASML.AS has yielded a comparatively lower 30.51% annualized return.
KLAC
- 1D
- 6.50%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 21.34%
- 6M
- 36.92%
- 1Y
- 118.24%
- 3Y*
- 55.93%
- 5Y*
- 34.90%
- 10Y*
- 37.36%
ASML.AS
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -11.13%
- YTD
- 19.85%
- 6M
- 33.72%
- 1Y
- 99.41%
- 3Y*
- 25.21%
- 5Y*
- 16.84%
- 10Y*
- 30.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLAC vs. ASML.AS — Risk / Return Rank
KLAC
ASML.AS
KLAC vs. ASML.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KLA Corporation (KLAC) and ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KLAC | ASML.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.41 | 2.59 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.74 | 3.10 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.40 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.37 | 6.43 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.17 | 17.14 | +0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KLAC | ASML.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.59 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.42 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | 0.86 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.67 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between KLAC and ASML.AS is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
KLAC vs. ASML.AS - Dividend Comparison
KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than ASML.AS's 0.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLAC KLA Corporation | 0.52% | 0.61% | 0.96% | 0.92% | 1.25% | 0.91% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 3.17% | 2.15% | 2.67% | 2.94% |
ASML.AS ASML Holding NV | 0.59% | 0.71% | 0.92% | 0.87% | 1.28% | 0.47% | 0.64% | 1.19% | 1.02% | 0.83% | 0.98% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
KLAC vs. ASML.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLAC drawdown since its inception was -83.74%, which is greater than ASML.AS's maximum drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLAC and ASML.AS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLAC | ASML.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.74% | -89.99% | +6.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.41% | -15.81% | -6.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.28% | -47.93% | +7.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.28% | -47.93% | +7.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.49% | -13.13% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.47% | -32.74% | +3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.00% | 5.96% | +1.04% |
Volatility
KLAC vs. ASML.AS - Volatility Comparison
KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a higher volatility of 17.00% compared to ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS) at 12.38%. This indicates that KLAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KLAC | ASML.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.00% | 12.38% | +4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.03% | 27.61% | +9.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.32% | 37.96% | +11.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.63% | 39.51% | +3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.93% | 34.84% | +6.09% |
Financials
KLAC vs. ASML.AS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KLA Corporation and ASML Holding NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities