CLMB vs. C
CLMB (Climb Global Solutions) and C (Citigroup Inc.) are both stocks. CLMB operates in Electronics & Computer Distribution (Technology), while C operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CLMB returned 22.82%/yr vs 14.72%/yr for C. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CLMB vs. C - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLMB achieves a 5.92% return, which is significantly lower than C's 16.19% return. Over the past 10 years, CLMB has outperformed C with an annualized return of 22.82%, while C has yielded a comparatively lower 14.72% annualized return.
CLMB
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 14.08%
- 6M
- -8.86%
- YTD
- 5.92%
- 1Y
- -1.83%
- 3Y*
- 39.60%
- 5Y*
- 34.97%
- 10Y*
- 22.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.40%
C
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- 6M
- 16.05%
- YTD
- 16.19%
- 1Y
- 49.51%
- 3Y*
- 47.41%
- 5Y*
- 18.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.40B | $1.68B | $1.68B | |
| $4.41M | $4.23M | $3.78M |
CLMB vs. C - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | 5.92% | -18.40% | 133.60% | 76.59% | -8.29% | 88.47% | 22.14% | 70.90% | -37.08% | -7.01% |
C Citigroup Inc. | 16.19% | 70.38% | 41.93% | 18.98% | -22.09% | 0.93% | -19.70% | 57.82% | -28.49% | 27.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLMB and C is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 1995 | 0.12 |
The correlation between CLMB and C shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.30 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CLMB:
$507.94M
C:
$229.06B
CLMB:
$1.13
C:
$9.84
CLMB:
24.14
C:
13.58
CLMB:
0.70
C:
1.57
CLMB:
3.98
C:
1.20
CLMB:
$711.77M
C:
$153.60B
CLMB:
$112.22M
C:
$83.82B
CLMB:
$35.65M
C:
$28.05B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLMB vs. C — Risk / Return Rank
CLMB
C
CLMB vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLMB | C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.29 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 3.37 | -3.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 8.84 | -8.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLMB vs. C - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLMB drawdown since its inception was -89.12%, smaller than the maximum C drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLMB and C.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLMB | C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.12% | -98.00% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.40% | -14.76% | -38.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.40% | -31.31% | -22.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.40% | -44.31% | -9.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.40% | -56.51% | +3.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.96% | -64.17% | +40.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.23% | -43.57% | +11.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.43% | 5.62% | +22.81% |
Volatility
CLMB vs. C - Volatility Comparison
Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) has a higher volatility of 13.07% compared to Citigroup Inc. (C) at 10.57%. This indicates that CLMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLMB | C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.07% | 10.57% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.70% | 23.33% | +18.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.91% | 29.11% | +21.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.82% | 29.28% | +16.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.17% | 33.11% | +8.06% |
Dividends
CLMB vs. C - Dividend Comparison
CLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than C's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C Citigroup Inc. | 2.30% | 1.99% | 3.10% | 4.04% | 4.51% | 3.38% | 3.31% | 2.40% | 2.96% | 1.29% | 0.71% | 0.31% |
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | 0.31% | 0.66% | 0.67% | 1.24% | 2.16% | 1.94% | 3.56% | 4.20% | 6.80% | 4.07% | 3.64% | 3.71% |
Financials
CLMB vs. C - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Climb Global Solutions and Citigroup Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLMB vs. C - Profitability Comparison
CLMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a gross profit of 30.16M and revenue of 174.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.3%.
C - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a gross profit of 24.77B and revenue of 24.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
CLMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported an operating income of 7.39M and revenue of 174.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
C - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported an operating income of 8.03B and revenue of 24.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.4%.
CLMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a net income of 5.52M and revenue of 174.21M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
C - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a net income of 5.83B and revenue of 24.77B, resulting in a net margin of 23.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLMB and C have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLMB has higher volatility (13.07%) compared to C (10.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLMB dropped -89.12% vs C's -98.00%.
C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLMB and C
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer