PortfoliosLab logo
CLMB vs. C
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CLMB and C is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CLMB vs. C - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Citigroup Inc. (C). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%3,000.00%3,500.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2,576.26%
83.03%
CLMB
C

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLMB:

1.97

C:

0.49

Sortino Ratio

CLMB:

2.75

C:

0.95

Omega Ratio

CLMB:

1.32

C:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

CLMB:

2.93

C:

0.22

Martin Ratio

CLMB:

8.27

C:

1.86

Ulcer Index

CLMB:

10.90%

C:

10.30%

Daily Std Dev

CLMB:

49.26%

C:

33.92%

Max Drawdown

CLMB:

-89.12%

C:

-98.00%

Current Drawdown

CLMB:

-23.17%

C:

-81.36%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLMB:

$469.03M

C:

$131.19B

EPS

CLMB:

$4.27

C:

$6.33

PE Ratio

CLMB:

23.87

C:

11.10

PEG Ratio

CLMB:

1.56

C:

1.04

PS Ratio

CLMB:

0.91

C:

1.83

PB Ratio

CLMB:

4.88

C:

0.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLMB:

$511.23M

C:

$98.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLMB:

$96.59M

C:

$57.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

CLMB:

$35.29M

C:

$25.46B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLMB achieves a -15.21% return, which is significantly lower than C's 3.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CLMB has outperformed C with an annualized return of 23.55%, while C has yielded a comparatively lower 5.84% annualized return.


CLMB

YTD

-15.21%

1M

0.26%

6M

-9.73%

1Y

95.83%

5Y*

46.61%

10Y*

23.55%

C

YTD

3.03%

1M

12.27%

6M

5.67%

1Y

16.66%

5Y*

13.28%

10Y*

5.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLMB vs. C — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLMB is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLMB is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLMB is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLMB is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLMB is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLMB is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

C
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of C is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of C is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of C is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of C is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of C is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of C is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLMB vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CLMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the C Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLMB and C, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.97
0.49
CLMB
C

Dividends

CLMB vs. C - Dividend Comparison

CLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than C's 3.14% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CLMB
Climb Global Solutions
0.63%0.54%1.24%2.16%1.94%3.56%4.20%6.80%4.07%3.64%3.71%3.95%
C
Citigroup Inc.
3.14%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%0.07%

Drawdowns

CLMB vs. C - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLMB drawdown since its inception was -89.12%, smaller than the maximum C drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLMB and C. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-23.17%
-81.36%
CLMB
C

Volatility

CLMB vs. C - Volatility Comparison

Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Citigroup Inc. (C) have volatilities of 9.58% and 9.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.58%
9.18%
CLMB
C

Financials

CLMB vs. C - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Climb Global Solutions and Citigroup Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20212022202320242025
138.04M
41.46B
(CLMB) Total Revenue
(C) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items