CLMB vs. C

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CLMB (Climb Global Solutions) and C (Citigroup Inc.) are both stocks. CLMB operates in Electronics & Computer Distribution (Technology), while C operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CLMB returned 20.81%/yr vs 14.58%/yr for C. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CLMB vs. C - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Citigroup Inc. (C). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLMB achieves a -12.48% return, which is significantly lower than C's 13.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CLMB has outperformed C with an annualized return of 20.81%, while C has yielded a comparatively lower 14.58% annualized return.

CLMB

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 19.06%
• YTD: -12.48%
• 6M: -12.66%
• 1Y: -16.06%
• 3Y*: 24.20%
• 5Y*: 26.60%
• 10Y*: 20.81%

C

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: 3.48%
• YTD: 13.61%
• 6M: 28.47%
• 1Y: 77.09%
• 3Y*: 46.22%
• 5Y*: 14.40%
• 10Y*: 14.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLMB vs. C - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLMB Climb Global Solutions	-12.48%	-18.40%	133.60%	76.59%	-8.29%	88.47%	22.14%	70.90%	-37.08%	-7.01%
C Citigroup Inc.	13.61%	70.38%	41.93%	18.98%	-22.09%	0.93%	-19.70%	57.82%	-28.49%	27.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CLMB and C is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1995	0.12

The correlation between CLMB and C shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.32 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CLMB : $409.68M C : $233.12B
EPS CLMB : $1.16 C : $8.65
PE Ratio CLMB : 19.46 C : 15.18
PS Ratio CLMB : 0.59 C : 1.42
PB Ratio CLMB : 3.46 C : 1.22
Total Revenue (TTM) CLMB : $696.85M C : $171.19B
Gross Profit (TTM) CLMB : $108.37M C : $77.85B
EBITDA (TTM) CLMB : $35.93M C : $24.12B

Return for Risk

CLMB vs. C — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLMB

CLMB Risk / Return Rank: 27
CLMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
CLMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
CLMB Omega Ratio Rank: 27
CLMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
CLMB Martin Ratio Rank: 27

C

C Risk / Return Rank: 92
C Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
C Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
C Omega Ratio Rank: 90
C Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
C Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLMB vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLMB	C	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.31	2.78	-3.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.10	3.41	-3.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.44	-0.46
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	5.30	-5.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.71	15.30	-16.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLMB vs. C - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLMB Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the C Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLMB and C, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLMB	C	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.31	2.78	-3.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.50	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.44	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.15	+0.06

Drawdowns

CLMB vs. C - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLMB drawdown since its inception was -89.12%, smaller than the maximum C drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLMB and C.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLMB	C	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.12%	-98.00%	+8.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.40%	-14.76%	-38.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.40%	-31.31%	-22.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.40%	-47.56%	-5.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.40%	-56.51%	+3.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.17%	-64.97%	+27.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.23%	-43.50%	+11.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.42%	5.11%	+20.31%

Volatility

CLMB vs. C - Volatility Comparison

Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) has a higher volatility of 9.74% compared to Citigroup Inc. (C) at 7.43%. This indicates that CLMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLMB	C	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.74%	7.43%	+2.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.36%	22.65%	+17.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.84%	27.83%	+24.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.72%	29.11%	+16.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.85%	33.20%	+7.65%

Dividends

CLMB vs. C - Dividend Comparison

CLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than C's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
C Citigroup Inc.	1.83%	1.99%	3.10%	4.04%	4.51%	3.38%	3.31%	2.40%	2.96%	1.29%	0.71%	0.31%
CLMB Climb Global Solutions	0.38%	0.66%	0.67%	1.24%	2.16%	1.94%	3.56%	4.20%	6.80%	4.07%	3.64%	3.71%

Financials

CLMB vs. C - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Climb Global Solutions and Citigroup Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CLMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a gross profit of 26.50M and revenue of 182.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.5%.

C - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.76B and revenue of 44.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

CLMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported an operating income of 3.88M and revenue of 182.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.

C - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported an operating income of 7.52B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.

CLMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a net income of 3.33M and revenue of 182.38M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.

C - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a net income of 5.79B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLMB and C in my portfolio?

CLMB and C have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLMB or C?

CLMB has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to C (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLMB dropped -89.12% vs C's -98.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.