CLMB vs. LRCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLMB or LRCX.
Key characteristics
| CLMB | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.05% | 16.85% |
| 1Y Return | 19.71% | 78.97% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 34.79% | 14.49% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 39.49% | 37.77% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 17.87% | 33.92% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.42 | 2.21 |
| Daily Std Dev | 43.91% | 33.97% |
| Max Drawdown | -89.12% | -87.91% |
| Current Drawdown | -21.85% | -7.98% |
Fundamentals
| CLMB | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $269.79M | $118.78B |
| EPS | $2.58 | $27.26 |
| PE Ratio | 22.81 | 33.33 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.28 | 2.72 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $359.40M | $14.24B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $54.09M | $7.87B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $19.27M | $4.42B |
Correlation
The correlation between CLMB and LRCX is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CLMB vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CLMB achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 16.85% return. Over the past 10 years, CLMB has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 17.87%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 33.92% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CLMB vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CLMB vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
CLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than LRCX's 0.85% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | 1.21% | 1.24% | 2.16% | 1.94% | 3.56% | 4.20% | 6.80% | 4.07% | 3.64% | 3.71% | 3.95% | 4.80% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.85% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% | 0.68% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CLMB vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLMB drawdown since its inception was -89.12%, roughly equal to the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLMB and LRCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CLMB vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) has a higher volatility of 13.25% compared to Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) at 10.79%. This indicates that CLMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CLMB vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Climb Global Solutions and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities