PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLAC vs. INTT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KLAC vs. INTT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KLA Corporation (KLAC) and inTEST Corporation (INTT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLAC achieves a 50.85% return, which is significantly lower than INTT's 65.33% return. Over the past 10 years, KLAC has outperformed INTT with an annualized return of 39.77%, while INTT has yielded a comparatively lower 11.96% annualized return.


KLAC

1D
1.38%
1M
-22.39%
6M
28.36%
YTD
50.85%
1Y
107.52%
3Y*
53.92%
5Y*
40.75%
10Y*
39.77%
ALL TIME*
22.49%

INTT

1D
0.00%
1M
-21.34%
6M
34.97%
YTD
65.33%
1Y
74.68%
3Y*
-16.22%
5Y*
-2.90%
10Y*
11.96%
ALL TIME*
1.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.18M$2.38M$5.26M
$2.50B$2.71B$2.78B

KLAC vs. INTT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KLAC
KLA Corporation
50.85%94.48%9.36%56.05%-11.20%68.05%47.94%103.99%-12.49%36.80%
INTT
inTEST Corporation
65.33%-13.04%-36.84%32.04%-19.03%96.00%9.07%-2.94%-29.13%88.04%

Correlation

The correlation between KLAC and INTT is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 1997

0.19

Over the past year, KLAC and INTT have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KLAC:

$238.81B

INTT:

$155.17M

EPS

KLAC:

$3.66

INTT:

$0.05

PE Ratio

KLAC:

49.92

INTT:

257.03

PEG Ratio

KLAC:

3.11

INTT:

6.27

PS Ratio

KLAC:

17.76

INTT:

1.25

PB Ratio

KLAC:

37.86

INTT:

1.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

KLAC:

$13.58B

INTT:

$121.07M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KLAC:

$8.32B

INTT:

$53.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

KLAC:

$6.12B

INTT:

$4.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KLAC vs. INTT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KLAC
KLAC Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
KLAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLAC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
KLAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLAC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

INTT
INTT Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
INTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
INTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KLAC vs. INTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KLA Corporation (KLAC) and inTEST Corporation (INTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KLACINTTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.22

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

1.95

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.80

6.99

+2.81

KLAC vs. INTT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the INTT Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLAC and INTT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KLAC vs. INTT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLAC drawdown since its inception was -83.74%, smaller than the maximum INTT drawdown of -99.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLAC and INTT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLACINTTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.74%

-99.53%

+15.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.59%

-39.58%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.59%

-72.45%

+28.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.59%

-78.82%

+35.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.59%

-78.82%

+35.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.41%

-54.11%

+14.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.29%

-73.56%

+44.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.20%

11.00%

+0.20%

Volatility

KLAC vs. INTT - Volatility Comparison

KLA Corporation (KLAC) and inTEST Corporation (INTT) have volatilities of 22.35% and 23.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLACINTTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.35%

23.22%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.87%

55.79%

-3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.59%

67.51%

-7.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.07%

59.28%

-13.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.21%

57.45%

-14.24%

Dividends

KLAC vs. INTT - Dividend Comparison

KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, while INTT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTT
inTEST Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KLAC
KLA Corporation
0.44%0.61%0.96%0.92%1.25%0.91%1.35%1.74%3.17%2.15%2.67%2.94%

Financials

KLAC vs. INTT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KLA Corporation and inTEST Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

KLAC vs. INTT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between KLA Corporation and inTEST Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

KLAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KLA Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.24B and revenue of 3.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.4%.

INTT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, inTEST Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.41M and revenue of 33.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.

KLAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KLA Corporation reported an operating income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.5%.

INTT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, inTEST Corporation reported an operating income of 954.00K and revenue of 33.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.

KLAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KLA Corporation reported a net income of 1.36B and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in a net margin of 37.3%.

INTT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, inTEST Corporation reported a net income of 789.00K and revenue of 33.89M, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KLAC and INTT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTT has higher volatility (23.22%) compared to KLAC (22.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLAC dropped -83.74% vs INTT's -99.53%.

KLAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KLAC and INTT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer