CLMB vs. SCHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX).
SCHX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009.
Performance
CLMB vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CLMB vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | -20.97% | -18.40% | 133.60% | 76.59% | -8.29% | 88.47% | 22.14% | 70.90% | -37.08% | -7.01% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | -3.70% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLMB achieves a -20.97% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's -3.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CLMB has outperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 20.34%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.02% annualized return.
CLMB
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -8.47%
- YTD
- -20.97%
- 6M
- -40.77%
- 1Y
- -26.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 28.09%
- 10Y*
- 20.34%
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.31%
- YTD
- -3.70%
- 6M
- -1.70%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLMB vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
CLMB
SCHX
CLMB vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLMB | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | 0.98 | -1.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | 1.50 | -2.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.23 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 1.51 | -2.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 7.02 | -8.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLMB | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 0.98 | -1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.66 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.78 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.80 | -0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between CLMB and SCHX is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CLMB vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
CLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than SCHX's 1.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | 0.63% | 0.66% | 0.67% | 1.24% | 2.16% | 1.94% | 3.56% | 4.20% | 6.80% | 4.07% | 3.64% | 3.71% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Drawdowns
CLMB vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLMB drawdown since its inception was -89.12%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLMB and SCHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLMB | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.12% | -34.33% | -54.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.94% | -12.19% | -33.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.94% | -25.41% | -20.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.51% | -34.33% | -15.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.26% | -5.67% | -37.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.18% | -4.00% | -28.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.07% | 2.62% | +16.45% |
Volatility
CLMB vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) has a higher volatility of 10.87% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 5.36%. This indicates that CLMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CLMB | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.87% | 5.36% | +5.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.62% | 9.67% | +23.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.72% | 18.33% | +28.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.20% | 17.13% | +27.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.86% | 18.13% | +21.73% |