PortfoliosLab logo
KLAC vs. ASML
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between KLAC and ASML is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

KLAC vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KLA Corporation (KLAC) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KLAC:

0.02

ASML:

-0.44

Sortino Ratio

KLAC:

0.35

ASML:

-0.33

Omega Ratio

KLAC:

1.05

ASML:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

KLAC:

0.01

ASML:

-0.47

Martin Ratio

KLAC:

0.01

ASML:

-0.70

Ulcer Index

KLAC:

19.11%

ASML:

30.06%

Daily Std Dev

KLAC:

49.51%

ASML:

48.56%

Max Drawdown

KLAC:

-83.74%

ASML:

-90.00%

Current Drawdown

KLAC:

-12.46%

ASML:

-31.40%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KLAC:

$104.35B

ASML:

$293.53B

EPS

KLAC:

$27.06

ASML:

$25.23

PE Ratio

KLAC:

28.73

ASML:

29.59

PEG Ratio

KLAC:

1.47

ASML:

1.44

PS Ratio

KLAC:

9.03

ASML:

9.56

PB Ratio

KLAC:

25.67

ASML:

14.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

KLAC:

$11.55B

ASML:

$30.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KLAC:

$7.03B

ASML:

$15.98B

EBITDA (TTM)

KLAC:

$4.88B

ASML:

$11.31B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLAC achieves a 23.40% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's 8.32% return. Over the past 10 years, KLAC has outperformed ASML with an annualized return of 31.68%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively lower 22.11% annualized return.


KLAC

YTD

23.40%

1M

12.77%

6M

23.01%

1Y

1.14%

3Y*

29.14%

5Y*

36.06%

10Y*

31.68%

ASML

YTD

8.32%

1M

12.15%

6M

11.98%

1Y

-21.29%

3Y*

9.62%

5Y*

18.85%

10Y*

22.11%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KLA Corporation

ASML Holding N.V.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KLAC vs. ASML — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KLAC is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KLAC is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KLAC is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KLAC is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KLAC is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KLAC is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ASML is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ASML is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ASML is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ASML is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ASML is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ASML is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KLAC vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KLA Corporation (KLAC) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current KLAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLAC and ASML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

KLAC vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than ASML's 0.91% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KLAC
KLA Corporation
0.87%0.96%0.92%1.25%0.91%1.35%1.74%3.17%2.15%2.67%2.94%26.17%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.91%0.97%0.85%1.27%0.50%0.59%1.20%1.10%0.75%1.02%0.91%0.77%

Drawdowns

KLAC vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLAC drawdown since its inception was -83.74%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLAC and ASML.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

KLAC vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a higher volatility of 12.57% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 9.03%. This indicates that KLAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

KLAC vs. ASML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KLA Corporation and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
3.06B
7.74B
(KLAC) Total Revenue
(ASML) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KLAC vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between KLA Corporation and ASML Holding N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
61.6%
54.0%
(KLAC) Gross Margin
(ASML) Gross Margin
KLAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, KLA Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.89B and revenue of 3.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

ASML - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.18B and revenue of 7.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.0%.

KLAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, KLA Corporation reported an operating income of 1.30B and revenue of 3.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.5%.

ASML - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 2.74B and revenue of 7.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.4%.

KLAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, KLA Corporation reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 3.06B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.

ASML - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.36B and revenue of 7.74B, resulting in a net margin of 30.4%.