KLAC vs. ASML

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about KLA Corporation (KLAC) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML).

Performance

KLAC vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KLA Corporation (KLAC) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KLAC vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KLAC KLA Corporation	21.34%	94.48%	9.36%	56.05%	-11.20%	68.05%	47.94%	103.99%	-12.49%	36.80%
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	23.62%	56.51%	-7.70%	39.91%	-30.49%	64.13%	66.06%	93.56%	-9.80%	56.23%

Fundamentals

Market Cap KLAC : $194.66B ASML : $513.67B
EPS KLAC : $34.42 ASML : $23.77
PE Ratio KLAC : 42.78 ASML : 55.57
PEG Ratio KLAC : 1.60 ASML : 3.99
PS Ratio KLAC : 15.30 ASML : 16.35
PB Ratio KLAC : 35.61 ASML : 26.20
Total Revenue (TTM) KLAC : $12.74B ASML : $31.38B
Gross Profit (TTM) KLAC : $7.89B ASML : $16.58B
EBITDA (TTM) KLAC : $5.71B ASML : $11.94B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLAC achieves a 21.34% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 23.62% return. Over the past 10 years, KLAC has outperformed ASML with an annualized return of 37.36%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively lower 30.71% annualized return.

KLAC

• 1D: 6.50%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: 21.34%
• 6M: 36.92%
• 1Y: 118.24%
• 3Y*: 55.93%
• 5Y*: 34.90%
• 10Y*: 37.36%

ASML

• 1D: 5.33%
• 1M: -8.94%
• YTD: 23.62%
• 6M: 36.86%
• 1Y: 101.57%
• 3Y*: 26.02%
• 5Y*: 16.89%
• 10Y*: 30.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KLAC vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLAC

KLAC Risk / Return Rank: 93
KLAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
KLAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
KLAC Omega Ratio Rank: 91
KLAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
KLAC Martin Ratio Rank: 96

ASML

ASML Risk / Return Rank: 93
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 90
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLAC vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KLA Corporation (KLAC) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KLAC	ASML	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.45	-0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	3.04	-0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.39	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.37	5.49	-0.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.17	15.40	+1.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KLAC vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLAC and ASML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KLAC	ASML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	2.45	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	0.41	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92	0.81	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.54	-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between KLAC and ASML is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

KLAC vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than ASML's 0.71% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KLAC KLA Corporation	0.52%	0.61%	0.96%	0.92%	1.25%	0.91%	1.35%	1.74%	3.17%	2.15%	2.67%	2.94%
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	0.71%	0.97%	0.97%	0.86%	1.27%	0.50%	0.50%	1.40%	0.94%	0.64%	0.92%	0.73%

Drawdowns

KLAC vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLAC drawdown since its inception was -83.74%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLAC and ASML.

Drawdown Indicators

	KLAC	ASML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.74%	-90.00%	+6.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.41%	-17.85%	-4.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.28%	-56.84%	+16.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.28%	-56.84%	+16.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.49%	-13.47%	+0.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.47%	-28.28%	-1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.00%	6.37%	+0.63%

Volatility

KLAC vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a higher volatility of 17.00% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 14.88%. This indicates that KLAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KLAC	ASML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.00%	14.88%	+2.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.03%	29.34%	+7.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.32%	41.81%	+7.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.63%	41.55%	+1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.93%	38.06%	+2.87%

Financials

KLAC vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between KLA Corporation and ASML Holding N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KLAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, KLA Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.03B and revenue of 3.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.5%.

ASML - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.47B and revenue of 8.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.1%.

KLAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, KLA Corporation reported an operating income of 1.36B and revenue of 3.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.3%.

ASML - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 2.51B and revenue of 8.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.8%.

KLAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, KLA Corporation reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 3.30B, resulting in a net margin of 34.8%.

ASML - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.07B and revenue of 8.43B, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.