PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLMB vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CLMB vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CLMB vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLMB
Climb Global Solutions
-22.87%-18.40%133.60%76.59%-8.29%88.47%22.14%70.90%-37.08%-7.01%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
15.71%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%

Fundamentals

EPS

CLMB:

$4.71

COST:

$25.63

PE Ratio

CLMB:

4.21

COST:

38.87

PEG Ratio

CLMB:

0.18

COST:

3.04

PS Ratio

CLMB:

0.14

COST:

1.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLMB:

$652.52M

COST:

$286.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLMB:

$105.27M

COST:

$19.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

CLMB:

$36.71M

COST:

$12.73B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLMB achieves a -22.87% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 15.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CLMB has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 20.05%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.28% annualized return.


CLMB

1D
2.22%
1M
-16.27%
YTD
-22.87%
6M
-41.11%
1Y
-28.09%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
27.47%
10Y*
20.05%

COST

1D
-0.02%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
15.71%
6M
7.95%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
27.83%
5Y*
24.28%
10Y*
22.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLMB vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLMB
CLMB Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CLMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLMB Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CLMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLMB Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLMB vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLMBCOSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.60

0.30

-0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.67

0.57

-1.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.07

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

0.40

-0.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.43

0.80

-2.23

CLMB vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLMB Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLMB and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLMBCOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.60

0.30

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

1.08

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

1.02

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.59

-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between CLMB and COST is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CLMB vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

CLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than COST's 0.52% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLMB
Climb Global Solutions
0.64%0.66%0.67%1.24%2.16%1.94%3.56%4.20%6.80%4.07%3.64%3.71%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.52%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%

Drawdowns

CLMB vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLMB drawdown since its inception was -89.12%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLMB and COST.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CLMBCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.12%

-53.39%

-35.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.94%

-19.35%

-26.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.94%

-31.40%

-14.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.51%

-31.40%

-18.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.63%

-6.96%

-37.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.18%

-13.40%

-18.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.88%

9.67%

+9.21%

Volatility

CLMB vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) has a higher volatility of 10.51% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.41%. This indicates that CLMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CLMBCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.51%

4.41%

+6.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.57%

13.36%

+20.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.68%

20.15%

+26.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.19%

22.51%

+21.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.86%

21.90%

+17.96%

Financials

CLMB vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Climb Global Solutions and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
193.85M
69.60B
(CLMB) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CLMB vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Climb Global Solutions and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-15.0%-10.0%-5.0%0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
15.4%
-12.6%
Portfolio components
CLMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a gross profit of 29.83M and revenue of 193.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -8.80B and revenue of 69.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -12.6%.

CLMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported an operating income of 9.52M and revenue of 193.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.61B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

CLMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a net income of 6.98M and revenue of 193.85M, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.04B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.