KGRN vs. KEMQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

KGRN (KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF) and KEMQ (KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KGRN is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index, while KEMQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KGRN returned -7.84%/yr vs -3.09%/yr for KEMQ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KGRN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KEMQ.

Performance

KGRN vs. KEMQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGRN achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than KEMQ's 5.78% return.

KGRN

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -6.12%
• YTD: 0.04%
• 6M: -2.21%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: 2.68%
• 5Y*: -7.84%
• 10Y*: —

KEMQ

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 5.78%
• 6M: 7.44%
• 1Y: 33.37%
• 3Y*: 24.22%
• 5Y*: -3.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KGRN vs. KEMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF	0.04%	21.45%	-1.11%	-14.75%	-40.45%	5.91%	138.49%	12.12%	-29.32%	-0.37%
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF	5.78%	56.28%	13.81%	0.77%	-38.09%	-27.31%	39.26%	28.26%	-25.52%	1.35%

Correlation

The correlation between KGRN and KEMQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2017	0.65

The correlation between KGRN and KEMQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

KGRN vs. KEMQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KGRN	KEMQ
Consumer Cyclical	36.8%	33.0%
Industrials	26.5%	-
Utilities	21.2%	-
Technology	11.6%	45.0%
Energy	3.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	15.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.4%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	3.5%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

KGRN vs. KEMQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGRN

KGRN Risk / Return Rank: 12
KGRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
KGRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
KGRN Omega Ratio Rank: 12
KGRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
KGRN Martin Ratio Rank: 11

KEMQ

KEMQ Risk / Return Rank: 34
KEMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
KEMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
KEMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
KEMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
KEMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KGRN vs. KEMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KGRN	KEMQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.20	1.28	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.45	1.84	-1.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.23	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.27	1.53	-1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.46	4.08	-3.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KGRN vs. KEMQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the KEMQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGRN and KEMQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KGRN	KEMQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20	1.28	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.23	-0.10	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.06	+0.01

Drawdowns

KGRN vs. KEMQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGRN drawdown since its inception was -66.24%, smaller than the maximum KEMQ drawdown of -70.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGRN and KEMQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	KGRN	KEMQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.24%	-70.72%	+4.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.26%	-21.94%	+4.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.19%	-21.94%	-20.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.60%	-66.02%	+2.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.62%	-28.96%	-18.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.96%	-35.68%	+1.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.13%	8.21%	+1.92%

Volatility

KGRN vs. KEMQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) is 7.36%, while KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that KGRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KGRN	KEMQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.36%	10.12%	-2.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.12%	20.90%	-5.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.05%	26.17%	-3.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.75%	31.88%	+2.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.86%	29.58%	+3.28%

KGRN vs. KEMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KGRN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMQ's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

KGRN vs. KEMQ - Dividend Comparison

KGRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than KEMQ's 4.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF	4.98%	5.27%	0.73%	0.29%	0.00%	0.28%	2.28%	1.76%	0.00%
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF	0.85%	0.85%	1.49%	0.74%	1.98%	0.41%	0.01%	5.88%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KGRN and KEMQ in my portfolio?

KGRN and KEMQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KGRN or KEMQ?

KEMQ has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to KGRN (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGRN dropped -66.24% vs KEMQ's -70.72%.

Which ETF is better, KGRN or KEMQ?

On 5-year performance, KEMQ leads with -3.09% vs -7.84% for KGRN. On fees, KEMQ is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, KGRN has been the lower-risk option at 7.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KGRN or KEMQ?

Over the 5-year period, KEMQ has performed better with a -3.09% return vs -7.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KGRN or KEMQ?

KEMQ is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KGRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KGRN or KEMQ?

KEMQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 0.85% for KGRN.

What is the main difference between KGRN and KEMQ?

KGRN is categorized as China Equities, while KEMQ is Emerging Markets Equities. KGRN tracks MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index, while KEMQ tracks Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KGRN and 0.60% for KEMQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEMQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.