KGRN vs. ASHS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS).

KGRN and ASHS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KGRN is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2017. ASHS is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the CSI 500 Index. It was launched on May 21, 2014. Both KGRN and ASHS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

KGRN vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KGRN vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF	6.02%	21.45%	-1.11%	-14.75%	-40.45%	5.91%	138.49%	12.12%	-29.32%	-0.37%
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	4.66%	39.48%	2.68%	-10.03%	-24.78%	17.66%	28.22%	24.53%	-35.91%	-6.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGRN achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly higher than ASHS's 4.66% return.

KGRN

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 4.51%
• YTD: 6.02%
• 6M: -9.29%
• 1Y: 12.37%
• 3Y*: 1.07%
• 5Y*: -6.33%
• 10Y*: —

ASHS

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -11.46%
• YTD: 4.66%
• 6M: 7.27%
• 1Y: 40.76%
• 3Y*: 7.63%
• 5Y*: 3.78%
• 10Y*: 2.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KGRN vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KGRN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.

KGRN

KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF

ASHS

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF

Return for Risk

KGRN vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGRN

KGRN Risk / Return Rank: 27
KGRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
KGRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
KGRN Omega Ratio Rank: 27
KGRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
KGRN Martin Ratio Rank: 22

ASHS

ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 85
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KGRN vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KGRN	ASHS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	1.70	-1.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.81	2.16	-1.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.32	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	2.85	-2.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.44	10.16	-8.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KGRN vs. ASHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the ASHS Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGRN and ASHS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KGRN	ASHS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45	1.70	-1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.18	0.15	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.17	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between KGRN and ASHS is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

KGRN vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison

KGRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while ASHS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF	0.81%	0.85%	1.49%	0.74%	1.98%	0.41%	0.01%	5.88%	2.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	0.65%	1.90%	0.76%	0.43%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	8.34%

Drawdowns

KGRN vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGRN drawdown since its inception was -66.24%, smaller than the maximum ASHS drawdown of -69.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGRN and ASHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	KGRN	ASHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.24%	-69.90%	+3.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.26%	-14.03%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.60%	-47.81%	-15.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.48%	-39.59%	-4.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.73%	-48.78%	+15.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.17%	3.93%	+5.24%

Volatility

KGRN vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) is 7.77%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that KGRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KGRN	ASHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.77%	8.57%	-0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.67%	16.21%	+1.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.60%	24.04%	+3.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.85%	26.08%	+8.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.06%	25.64%	+7.42%