KGRN vs. KBA
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA).
KGRN and KBA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KGRN is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2017. KBA is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Index. It was launched on Mar 5, 2014. Both KGRN and KBA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KGRN or KBA.
Correlation
The correlation between KGRN and KBA is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
KGRN vs. KBA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KGRN:
0.06
KBA:
0.56
KGRN:
0.36
KBA:
1.02
KGRN:
1.04
KBA:
1.15
KGRN:
0.03
KBA:
0.33
KGRN:
0.17
KBA:
1.63
KGRN:
13.71%
KBA:
10.13%
KGRN:
36.69%
KBA:
29.68%
KGRN:
-66.36%
KBA:
-53.24%
KGRN:
-57.54%
KBA:
-37.72%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGRN achieves a -2.24% return, which is significantly lower than KBA's 12.94% return.
KGRN
-2.24%
-0.99%
12.23%
6.24%
5.49%
N/A
KBA
12.94%
-4.22%
6.66%
19.03%
0.89%
0.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KGRN vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
KGRN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KGRN vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KGRN vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison
Neither KGRN nor KBA has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.74% | 1.60% | 0.41% | 0.01% | 5.88% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 0.00% | 2.34% | 26.65% | 9.06% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 3.77% | 1.00% | 4.90% | 29.08% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
KGRN vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGRN drawdown since its inception was -66.36%, which is greater than KBA's maximum drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGRN and KBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KGRN vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) has a higher volatility of 10.92% compared to KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) at 9.68%. This indicates that KGRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.