KGRN vs. KARS
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS).
KGRN and KARS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KGRN is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2017. KARS is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the KARS-US - Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index. It was launched on Jan 18, 2018. Both KGRN and KARS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KGRN or KARS.
Correlation
The correlation between KGRN and KARS is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
KGRN vs. KARS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KGRN:
0.19
KARS:
-0.40
KGRN:
0.54
KARS:
-0.40
KGRN:
1.07
KARS:
0.95
KGRN:
0.10
KARS:
-0.19
KGRN:
0.50
KARS:
-0.68
KGRN:
13.76%
KARS:
18.46%
KGRN:
36.50%
KARS:
31.05%
KGRN:
-66.36%
KARS:
-64.60%
KGRN:
-57.30%
KARS:
-57.42%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGRN achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly higher than KARS's -16.23% return.
KGRN
-1.70%
-0.67%
15.37%
3.52%
5.60%
N/A
KARS
-16.23%
-3.28%
9.79%
-14.73%
0.09%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KGRN vs. KARS - Expense Ratio Comparison
KGRN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than KARS's 0.70% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KGRN vs. KARS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KGRN vs. KARS - Dividend Comparison
Neither KGRN nor KARS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.74% | 1.60% | 0.41% | 0.01% | 5.88% | 2.04% |
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.88% | 1.13% | 6.73% | 0.14% | 1.85% | 1.39% |
Drawdowns
KGRN vs. KARS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGRN drawdown since its inception was -66.36%, roughly equal to the maximum KARS drawdown of -64.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGRN and KARS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KGRN vs. KARS - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) has a higher volatility of 10.94% compared to KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) at 10.08%. This indicates that KGRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KARS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.