ASHS vs. MIDE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE).
ASHS and MIDE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASHS is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the CSI 500 Index. It was launched on May 21, 2014. MIDE is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2021. Both ASHS and MIDE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ASHS vs. MIDE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASHS vs. MIDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 4.44% | 39.48% | 2.68% | -10.03% | -24.78% | 11.68% |
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 2.61% | 9.81% | 11.21% | 15.20% | -11.63% | 11.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASHS achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly higher than MIDE's 2.61% return.
ASHS
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -10.96%
- YTD
- 4.44%
- 6M
- 7.13%
- 1Y
- 40.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 2.05%
MIDE
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -5.40%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 19.04%
- 3Y*
- 11.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASHS vs. MIDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MIDE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ASHS vs. MIDE — Risk / Return Rank
ASHS
MIDE
ASHS vs. MIDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASHS | MIDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.68 | 0.90 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 1.39 | +0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.19 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 1.35 | +1.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.12 | 5.59 | +4.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASHS | MIDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 0.90 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.34 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.37 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHS and MIDE is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ASHS vs. MIDE - Dividend Comparison
ASHS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.90% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% |
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 1.46% | 1.52% | 1.45% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ASHS vs. MIDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHS drawdown since its inception was -69.90%, which is greater than MIDE's maximum drawdown of -24.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHS and MIDE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASHS | MIDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.90% | -24.59% | -45.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.03% | -14.54% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.81% | -24.59% | -23.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.72% | -5.94% | -33.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.78% | -6.67% | -42.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 3.50% | +0.50% |
Volatility
ASHS vs. MIDE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) have volatilities of 6.38% and 6.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASHS | MIDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.38% | 6.19% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.19% | 11.92% | +4.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 21.24% | +2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.08% | 19.69% | +6.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.64% | 19.80% | +5.84% |