KCDMY vs. SIVR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KCDMY (Kimberly-Clark de Mexico) is a stock, while SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Over the past 10 years, KCDMY returned 5.33%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for SIVR. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KCDMY vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCDMY achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's 2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, KCDMY has underperformed SIVR with an annualized return of 5.33%, while SIVR has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.

KCDMY

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -1.34%
• YTD: 4.49%
• 6M: 7.81%
• 1Y: 32.34%
• 3Y*: 9.43%
• 5Y*: 11.08%
• 10Y*: 5.33%

SIVR

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 2.85%
• 6M: 24.90%
• 1Y: 110.95%
• 3Y*: 45.38%
• 5Y*: 21.00%
• 10Y*: 15.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCDMY vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KCDMY Kimberly-Clark de Mexico	4.49%	55.77%	-28.48%	40.30%	15.89%	-3.90%	-9.84%	29.96%	-4.95%	4.36%
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	2.85%	145.34%	21.08%	-0.91%	2.59%	-12.33%	47.52%	15.17%	-8.96%	5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between KCDMY and SIVR is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2009	0.15

Return for Risk

KCDMY vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCDMY

KCDMY Risk / Return Rank: 75
KCDMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
KCDMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
KCDMY Omega Ratio Rank: 68
KCDMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
KCDMY Martin Ratio Rank: 80

SIVR

SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 48
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCDMY vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KCDMY	SIVR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.90	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	2.07	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.35	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	2.63	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.59	5.67	+0.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KCDMY vs. SIVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCDMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCDMY and SIVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KCDMY	SIVR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	1.90	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.58	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	0.50	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.32	-0.28

Drawdowns

KCDMY vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCDMY drawdown since its inception was -74.61%, roughly equal to the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCDMY and SIVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	KCDMY	SIVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.61%	-75.85%	+1.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.77%	-42.42%	+29.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.82%	-42.42%	+2.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.82%	-42.42%	+2.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.87%	-42.42%	-0.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.94%	-37.25%	+5.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.44%	-47.85%	+1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.92%	19.64%	-14.72%

Volatility

KCDMY vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark de Mexico (KCDMY) is 6.56%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 16.28%. This indicates that KCDMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KCDMY	SIVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.56%	16.28%	-9.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.08%	58.30%	-38.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.50%	58.84%	-31.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.30%	36.17%	-3.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.06%	31.87%	+2.19%

Dividends

KCDMY vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

KCDMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KCDMY Kimberly-Clark de Mexico	4.97%	4.82%	12.08%	3.96%	4.24%	6.72%	4.70%	4.08%	5.16%	7.20%	5.68%	3.98%
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KCDMY and SIVR in my portfolio?

KCDMY and SIVR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KCDMY or SIVR?

SIVR has higher volatility (16.28%) compared to KCDMY (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCDMY dropped -74.61% vs SIVR's -75.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.