KBWB vs. RSP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

KBWB (Invesco KBW Bank ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBWB is a Financials Equities fund tracking the KBW Nasdaq Bank Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KBWB returned 13.69%/yr vs 11.94%/yr for RSP. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KBWB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.

Performance

KBWB vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWB achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWB has outperformed RSP with an annualized return of 13.69%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.94% annualized return.

KBWB

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.73%
• 6M: 12.74%
• YTD: 15.29%
• 1Y: 36.87%
• 3Y*: 31.95%
• 5Y*: 11.96%
• 10Y*: 13.69%
• ALL TIME*: 13.87%

RSP

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 9.43%
• YTD: 13.16%
• 1Y: 20.39%
• 3Y*: 13.55%
• 5Y*: 8.88%
• 10Y*: 11.94%
• ALL TIME*: 11.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF	$147.63M	$184.17M	$155.76M
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	$1.86B	$1.85B	$2.06B

KBWB vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF	15.29%	32.05%	36.73%	-1.18%	-21.68%	37.72%	-10.46%	35.90%	-18.30%	18.11%
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	13.16%	11.21%	12.79%	13.70%	-11.62%	29.41%	12.66%	28.91%	-7.84%	18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWB and RSP is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2011	0.77

The correlation between KBWB and RSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KBWB vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KBWB	RSP
Financial Services	100.0%	14.8%
Basic Materials	-	4.6%
Communication Services	-	3.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.2%
Energy	-	4.2%
Healthcare	-	11.8%
Industrials	-	14.6%
Real Estate	-	6.0%
Technology	-	16.9%
Utilities	-	6.6%

Return for Risk

KBWB vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KBWB

KBWB Risk / Return Rank: 65
KBWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
KBWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
KBWB Omega Ratio Rank: 69
KBWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
KBWB Martin Ratio Rank: 55

RSP

RSP Risk / Return Rank: 73
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 69
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KBWB vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KBWB	RSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.63	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	2.38	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.29	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	2.43	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.52	9.43	-2.91

KBWB vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWB Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWB and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KBWB vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWB drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWB and RSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBWB	RSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.27%	-59.92%	+9.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.38%	-7.85%	-8.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.43%	-17.81%	-7.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.31%	-21.38%	-27.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.27%	-39.04%	-11.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.41%	-1.23%	-1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.62%	-6.61%	-5.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.18%	2.02%	+3.16%

Volatility

KBWB vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.88%. This indicates that KBWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBWB	RSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.81%	2.88%	+2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.94%	8.59%	+7.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.60%	11.76%	+8.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.39%	16.16%	+10.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.06%	18.28%	+10.78%

KBWB vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBWB vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF	1.93%	2.04%	2.46%	3.20%	3.05%	2.13%	2.62%	2.38%	2.54%	1.35%	1.53%	1.53%
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	1.49%	1.64%	1.52%	1.64%	1.82%	1.28%	1.64%	1.69%	2.02%	1.52%	1.20%	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBWB and RSP in my portfolio?

KBWB and RSP have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KBWB or RSP?

KBWB has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to RSP (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWB dropped -50.27% vs RSP's -59.92%.

Which ETF is better, KBWB or RSP?

On 10-year performance, KBWB leads with 13.69% vs 11.94% for RSP. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KBWB or RSP?

Over the 10-year period, KBWB has performed better with a 13.69% return vs 11.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBWB or RSP?

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KBWB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBWB or RSP?

KBWB has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.

What is the main difference between KBWB and RSP?

KBWB is categorized as Financials Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. KBWB tracks KBW Nasdaq Bank Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWB and 0.20% for RSP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KBWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.