PortfoliosLab logo
KBWB vs. VFH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between KBWB and VFH is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

KBWB vs. VFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

KBWB:

19.96%

VFH:

11.51%

Max Drawdown

KBWB:

-1.04%

VFH:

-0.57%

Current Drawdown

KBWB:

-0.13%

VFH:

-0.04%

Returns By Period


KBWB

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

VFH

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KBWB vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.10% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KBWB vs. VFH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KBWB is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KBWB is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KBWB is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KBWB is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KBWB is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KBWB is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VFH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VFH is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VFH is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VFH is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VFH is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VFH is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VFH is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KBWB vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

KBWB vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison

KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than VFH's 1.82% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
2.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

KBWB vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWB drawdown since its inception was -1.04%, which is greater than VFH's maximum drawdown of -0.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWB and VFH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

KBWB vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...