KBWB vs. FTXO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

KBWB (Invesco KBW Bank ETF) and FTXO (First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - KBWB tracks the KBW Nasdaq Bank Index while FTXO tracks the NASDAQ US Banks Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KBWB returned 11.16%/yr vs 8.64%/yr for FTXO. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. KBWB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXO.

Performance

KBWB vs. FTXO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWB achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly higher than FTXO's 8.60% return.

KBWB

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: 8.59%
• YTD: 12.18%
• 6M: 10.15%
• 1Y: 41.92%
• 3Y*: 36.76%
• 5Y*: 11.16%
• 10Y*: 13.99%

FTXO

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: 7.19%
• YTD: 8.60%
• 6M: 6.28%
• 1Y: 32.49%
• 3Y*: 28.73%
• 5Y*: 8.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWB vs. FTXO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF	12.18%	32.05%	36.73%	-1.18%	-21.68%	37.72%	-10.46%	35.90%	-18.30%	18.11%
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF	8.60%	21.32%	29.05%	0.05%	-17.93%	40.53%	-12.53%	30.11%	-21.79%	14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWB and FTXO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2016	0.97

The correlation between KBWB and FTXO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

KBWB vs. FTXO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KBWB	FTXO
Financial Services	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.4%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KBWB vs. FTXO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWB

KBWB Risk / Return Rank: 58
KBWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
KBWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
KBWB Omega Ratio Rank: 61
KBWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
KBWB Martin Ratio Rank: 49

FTXO

FTXO Risk / Return Rank: 42
FTXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FTXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
FTXO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FTXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FTXO Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWB vs. FTXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KBWB	FTXO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	1.57	+0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	2.14	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.28	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	1.96	+0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.09	5.40	+2.69

KBWB vs. FTXO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWB Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the FTXO Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWB and FTXO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KBWB vs. FTXO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWB drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum FTXO drawdown of -55.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWB and FTXO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBWB	FTXO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.27%	-55.26%	+4.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.38%	-16.69%	+0.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.43%	-25.84%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.31%	-46.55%	-2.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.99%	+0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.70%	-15.80%	+4.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.20%	6.03%	-0.83%

Volatility

KBWB vs. FTXO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) have volatilities of 5.65% and 5.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBWB	FTXO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.65%	5.82%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.88%	15.73%	+0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.30%	20.88%	-0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.55%	26.90%	-0.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.21%	29.94%	-0.73%

KBWB vs. FTXO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBWB vs. FTXO - Dividend Comparison

KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than FTXO's 1.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF	1.65%	1.92%	2.18%	3.20%	2.94%	1.64%	2.74%	2.53%	3.51%	1.09%	0.16%	0.00%
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF	2.43%	2.04%	2.46%	3.20%	3.05%	2.13%	2.62%	2.38%	2.54%	1.35%	1.53%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBWB and FTXO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, KBWB and FTXO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, KBWB or FTXO?

FTXO has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to KBWB (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWB dropped -50.27% vs FTXO's -55.26%.

Which ETF is better, KBWB or FTXO?

On 5-year performance, KBWB leads with 11.16% vs 8.64% for FTXO. On fees, KBWB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KBWB has been the lower-risk option at 5.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KBWB or FTXO?

Over the 5-year period, KBWB has performed better with a 11.16% return vs 8.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBWB or FTXO?

KBWB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBWB or FTXO?

KBWB has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 1.65% for FTXO.

What is the main difference between KBWB and FTXO?

KBWB tracks KBW Nasdaq Bank Index, while FTXO tracks NASDAQ US Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWB and 0.60% for FTXO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KBWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.