KBWB vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
KBWB and XLF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KBWB is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the KBW Nasdaq Bank Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011. XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both KBWB and XLF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KBWB or XLF.
Performance
KBWB vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBWB achieves a 44.70% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 34.95% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWB has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 8.97%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.
KBWB
44.70%
11.89%
32.07%
69.36%
7.52%
8.97%
XLF
34.95%
6.41%
22.22%
44.58%
13.14%
11.90%
Key characteristics
| KBWB | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.09 | 3.27 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.38 | 4.61 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.55 | 1.59 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.71 | 3.79 |
| Martin Ratio | 22.74 | 23.39 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.07% | 1.93% |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.57% | 13.82% |
| Max Drawdown | -50.27% | -82.69% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KBWB vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBWB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.13% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between KBWB and XLF is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KBWB vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KBWB vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than XLF's 1.33% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF | 2.35% | 3.20% | 3.05% | 2.13% | 2.63% | 2.38% | 2.54% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 1.53% | 1.52% | 1.43% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.33% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 1.95% | 1.61% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
KBWB vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBWB drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWB and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KBWB vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) has a higher volatility of 11.48% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 7.09%. This indicates that KBWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.