KBWB vs. KBE
KBWB (Invesco KBW Bank ETF) and KBE (State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - KBWB tracks the KBW Nasdaq Bank Index while KBE tracks the S&P Banks Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KBWB returned 13.69%/yr vs 11.05%/yr for KBE. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
KBWB vs. KBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with KBWB having a 15.29% return and KBE slightly higher at 16.05%. Over the past 10 years, KBWB has outperformed KBE with an annualized return of 13.69%, while KBE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.05% annualized return.
KBWB
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 1Y
- 36.87%
- 3Y*
- 31.95%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.87%
KBE
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 1Y
- 29.08%
- 3Y*
- 22.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $98.17M | $107.02M | $128.95M | |
| $147.63M | $184.17M | $155.76M |
KBWB vs. KBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF | 15.29% | 32.05% | 36.73% | -1.18% | -21.68% | 37.72% | -10.46% | 35.90% | -18.30% | 18.11% |
KBE State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF | 16.05% | 12.36% | 23.78% | 5.30% | -14.83% | 33.46% | -8.75% | 29.78% | -19.65% | 10.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBWB and KBE is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2011 | 0.94 |
The correlation between KBWB and KBE shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.94 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KBWB vs. KBE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KBWB
KBE
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
KBWB
KBE
Basic Materials
KBWB
-
KBE
-
Communication Services
KBWB
-
KBE
-
Consumer Cyclical
KBWB
-
KBE
-
Consumer Defensive
KBWB
-
KBE
-
Energy
KBWB
-
KBE
-
Healthcare
KBWB
-
KBE
-
Industrials
KBWB
-
KBE
-
Real Estate
KBWB
-
KBE
-
Technology
KBWB
-
KBE
-
Utilities
KBWB
-
KBE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBWB vs. KBE — Risk / Return Rank
KBWB
KBE
KBWB vs. KBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KBWB | KBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.24 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 1.85 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 4.90 | +1.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KBWB vs. KBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBWB drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum KBE drawdown of -83.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWB and KBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBWB | KBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -83.15% | +32.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.38% | -14.63% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.43% | -25.97% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.31% | -45.25% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.27% | -53.14% | +2.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.41% | -2.30% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.62% | -27.33% | +15.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.18% | 5.50% | -0.32% |
Volatility
KBWB vs. KBE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) at 5.24%. This indicates that KBWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBWB | KBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 5.24% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.94% | 14.49% | +1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.60% | 21.29% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.39% | 27.05% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.06% | 29.67% | -0.61% |
KBWB vs. KBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both KBWB and KBE have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
KBWB vs. KBE - Dividend Comparison
KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than KBE's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBE State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF | 2.11% | 2.51% | 2.35% | 2.78% | 2.99% | 2.16% | 2.44% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.36% | 1.39% | 1.70% |
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF | 1.93% | 2.04% | 2.46% | 3.20% | 3.05% | 2.13% | 2.62% | 2.38% | 2.54% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBWB and KBE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBWB has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to KBE (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWB dropped -50.27% vs KBE's -83.15%.
On 10-year performance, KBWB leads with 13.69% vs 11.05% for KBE. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, KBE has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, KBWB has performed better with a 13.69% return vs 11.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KBWB and KBE have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
KBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 1.93% for KBWB.
KBWB tracks KBW Nasdaq Bank Index, while KBE tracks S&P Banks Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street.
KBWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KBWB and KBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer