KBWB vs. IGF

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

KBWB (Invesco KBW Bank ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBWB is a Financials Equities fund tracking the KBW Nasdaq Bank Index, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KBWB returned 13.42%/yr vs 8.67%/yr for IGF. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KBWB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.

Performance

KBWB vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWB achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 9.68% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWB has outperformed IGF with an annualized return of 13.42%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.67% annualized return.

KBWB

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: 9.79%
• YTD: 10.56%
• 6M: 10.32%
• 1Y: 44.54%
• 3Y*: 33.36%
• 5Y*: 9.84%
• 10Y*: 13.42%

IGF

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 9.68%
• 6M: 10.24%
• 1Y: 17.04%
• 3Y*: 16.28%
• 5Y*: 10.22%
• 10Y*: 8.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWB vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF	10.56%	32.05%	36.73%	-1.18%	-21.68%	37.72%	-10.46%	35.90%	-18.30%	18.11%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	9.68%	21.31%	14.81%	6.14%	-1.26%	11.57%	-6.50%	25.82%	-9.95%	19.31%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWB and IGF is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2011	0.52

The correlation between KBWB and IGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KBWB vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KBWB	IGF
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	20.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	38.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	41.1%

Return for Risk

KBWB vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWB

KBWB Risk / Return Rank: 64
KBWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
KBWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
KBWB Omega Ratio Rank: 69
KBWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
KBWB Martin Ratio Rank: 53

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 54
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 49
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWB vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KBWB	IGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	1.55	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	2.22	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.27	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	2.78	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.02	8.03	-0.01

KBWB vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWB Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWB and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KBWB vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWB drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWB and IGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBWB	IGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.27%	-58.33%	+8.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.38%	-5.87%	-10.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.43%	-14.28%	-11.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.31%	-20.83%	-28.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.27%	-42.11%	-8.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.98%	+2.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.72%	-11.86%	+0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.20%	2.04%	+3.16%

Volatility

KBWB vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.85%. This indicates that KBWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBWB	IGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.85%	3.85%	+2.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.79%	8.73%	+7.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.41%	10.58%	+9.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.67%	14.00%	+12.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.21%	16.83%	+12.38%

KBWB vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBWB vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than IGF's 2.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	2.94%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF	1.94%	2.04%	2.46%	3.20%	3.05%	2.13%	2.62%	2.38%	2.54%	1.35%	1.53%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBWB and IGF in my portfolio?

KBWB and IGF have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KBWB or IGF?

KBWB has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to IGF (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWB dropped -50.27% vs IGF's -58.33%.

Which ETF is better, KBWB or IGF?

On 10-year performance, KBWB leads with 13.42% vs 8.67% for IGF. On fees, KBWB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KBWB or IGF?

Over the 10-year period, KBWB has performed better with a 13.42% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBWB or IGF?

KBWB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBWB or IGF?

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 1.94% for KBWB.

What is the main difference between KBWB and IGF?

KBWB is categorized as Financials Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. KBWB tracks KBW Nasdaq Bank Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWB and 0.39% for IGF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KBWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.