KBA vs. KURE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KBA (KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF) and KURE (KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF) are both China Equities funds from CICC - KBA tracks the MSCI China A Index while KURE tracks the MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KBA returned 6.66%/yr vs -16.49%/yr for KURE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KBA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for KURE.

Performance

KBA vs. KURE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBA achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than KURE's -11.50% return.

KBA

• 1D: -3.67%
• 1M: 2.74%
• YTD: 10.36%
• 6M: 10.50%
• 1Y: 45.45%
• 3Y*: 16.25%
• 5Y*: 6.66%
• 10Y*: 10.40%

KURE

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -6.16%
• YTD: -11.50%
• 6M: -14.51%
• 1Y: -6.43%
• 3Y*: -3.58%
• 5Y*: -16.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBA vs. KURE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF	10.36%	33.88%	15.73%	-16.77%	-3.49%	3.17%	41.62%	35.44%	-33.59%
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF	-11.50%	24.87%	-17.83%	-17.70%	-25.43%	-16.01%	68.97%	34.30%	-30.01%

Correlation

The correlation between KBA and KURE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2018	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between KBA and KURE has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KBA vs. KURE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KBA	KURE
Technology	34.1%	-
Financial Services	17.4%	-
Industrials	15.4%	-
Basic Materials	9.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	0.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	-
Healthcare	3.7%	99.3%
Utilities	3.2%	-
Energy	3.0%	-
Communication Services	1.4%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

KBA vs. KURE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBA

KBA Risk / Return Rank: 81
KBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
KBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
KBA Omega Ratio Rank: 77
KBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
KBA Martin Ratio Rank: 81

KURE

KURE Risk / Return Rank: 7
KURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
KURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
KURE Omega Ratio Rank: 7
KURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
KURE Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBA vs. KURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KBA	KURE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	-0.25	+2.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	-0.17	+3.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	0.98	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.97	-0.21	+6.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.15	-0.44	+15.59

KBA vs. KURE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBA Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the KURE Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBA and KURE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KBA vs. KURE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBA drawdown since its inception was -53.24%, smaller than the maximum KURE drawdown of -68.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBA and KURE.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBA	KURE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.24%	-68.53%	+15.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.65%	-30.88%	+23.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.23%	-34.05%	+2.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.76%	-67.94%	+28.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.67%	-61.46%	+57.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.71%	-38.20%	+12.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	14.64%	-11.63%

Volatility

KBA vs. KURE - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) has a higher volatility of 8.89% compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) at 7.68%. This indicates that KBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBA	KURE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.89%	7.68%	+1.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.20%	18.20%	-4.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.00%	26.23%	-7.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.35%	31.86%	-4.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.39%	32.34%	-6.95%

KBA vs. KURE - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KURE's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBA vs. KURE - Dividend Comparison

KBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than KURE's 4.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF	1.42%	1.56%	2.18%	2.34%	49.05%	9.07%	0.65%	1.53%	3.77%	1.46%	6.62%	29.08%
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF	4.74%	4.19%	1.29%	0.65%	0.05%	14.12%	0.00%	0.25%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBA and KURE in my portfolio?

KBA and KURE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KBA or KURE?

KBA has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to KURE (7.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBA dropped -53.24% vs KURE's -68.53%.

Which ETF is better, KBA or KURE?

On 5-year performance, KBA leads with 6.66% vs -16.49% for KURE. On fees, KBA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, KURE has been the lower-risk option at 7.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KBA or KURE?

Over the 5-year period, KBA has performed better with a 6.66% return vs -16.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBA or KURE?

KBA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KURE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBA or KURE?

KURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 1.42% for KBA.

What is the main difference between KBA and KURE?

KBA tracks MSCI China A Index, while KURE tracks MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for KBA and 0.65% for KURE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.