KBA vs. KRBN
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN).
KBA and KRBN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KBA is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Index. It was launched on Mar 5, 2014. KRBN is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the IHS Markit Global Carbon Index. It was launched on Jul 30, 2020. Both KBA and KRBN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
KBA vs. KRBN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KBA vs. KRBN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | -1.94% | 33.88% | 15.73% | -16.77% | -3.49% | 3.17% | 19.50% |
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF | -14.77% | 23.11% | -13.56% | 8.01% | -12.75% | 107.69% | 22.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBA achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly higher than KRBN's -14.77% return.
KBA
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 31.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.48%
- 5Y*
- 5.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.15%
KRBN
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- -14.77%
- 6M
- -5.87%
- 1Y
- 7.56%
- 3Y*
- -3.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KBA vs. KRBN - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KRBN's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KBA vs. KRBN — Risk / Return Rank
KBA
KRBN
KBA vs. KRBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KBA | KRBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.68 | 0.38 | +1.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 0.63 | +1.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.08 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 0.36 | +2.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.24 | 1.14 | +9.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KBA | KRBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 0.38 | +1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.31 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.51 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between KBA and KRBN is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
KBA vs. KRBN - Dividend Comparison
KBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than KRBN's 2.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 1.59% | 1.56% | 2.18% | 2.34% | 49.05% | 9.07% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 3.77% | 1.46% | 6.62% | 29.08% |
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF | 2.23% | 1.90% | 7.10% | 7.60% | 22.91% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KBA vs. KRBN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBA drawdown since its inception was -53.24%, which is greater than KRBN's maximum drawdown of -36.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBA and KRBN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBA | KRBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.24% | -36.42% | -16.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -24.98% | +14.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.42% | -36.42% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.96% | -22.31% | +17.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.15% | -16.06% | -10.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 7.84% | -4.88% |
Volatility
KBA vs. KRBN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) is 4.85%, while KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) has a volatility of 7.81%. This indicates that KBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KRBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KBA | KRBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 7.81% | -2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.80% | 15.60% | -3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.64% | 20.12% | -1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 28.49% | -1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.28% | 28.88% | -3.60% |