KBA vs. CN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

KBA (KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF) and CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) are both China Equities funds - KBA tracks the MSCI China A Index while CN tracks the MSCI China All Shares. Both are passively managed. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KBA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CN.

Performance

KBA vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KBA

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 0.24%
• 6M: 7.78%
• YTD: 6.21%
• 1Y: 32.90%
• 3Y*: 12.04%
• 5Y*: 6.35%
• 10Y*: 9.23%
• ALL TIME*: 9.44%

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF	$823.16K	$863.47K	$2.10M

KBA vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF	6.21%	33.88%	15.73%	-16.77%	-3.49%	3.17%	41.62%	35.44%	-26.28%	30.69%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-3.10%	-11.87%	-23.85%	-12.74%	31.55%	26.79%	-22.41%	43.69%

Correlation

The correlation between KBA and CN is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2014	0.74

The correlation between KBA and CN shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KBA vs. CN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KBA	CN
Technology	37.5%	0.3%
Financial Services	16.9%	55.1%
Industrials	14.4%	1.0%
Basic Materials	10.1%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	0.3%
Consumer Cyclical	4.1%	5.4%
Healthcare	4.0%	0.8%
Utilities	3.2%	0.2%
Energy	2.4%	0.9%
Communication Services	1.2%	0.4%
Real Estate	0.4%	0.8%

Return for Risk

KBA vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KBA

KBA Risk / Return Rank: 71
KBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
KBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
KBA Omega Ratio Rank: 64
KBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
KBA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

CN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KBA vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KBA	CN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.97	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.40	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KBA	CN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.29%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.53%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KBA	CN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.91%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.42%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.87%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.34%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.51%	—	—

KBA vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBA vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

KBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF	1.47%	1.56%	2.18%	2.34%	49.05%	9.07%	0.65%	1.53%	3.77%	1.46%	6.62%	29.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBA and CN in my portfolio?

KBA and CN have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KBA or CN?

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBA or CN?

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KBA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBA or CN?

KBA has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

What is the main difference between KBA and CN?

KBA tracks MSCI China A Index, while CN tracks MSCI China All Shares. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for KBA and 0.50% for CN.