KARS vs. XLII

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

KARS (KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF) and XLII (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KARS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index, while XLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. KARS is passively managed, while XLII is actively managed. Over the past year, KARS returned 25.51% vs 20.71% for XLII. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. KARS charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLII.

Performance

KARS vs. XLII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KARS achieves a -3.13% return, which is significantly lower than XLII's 11.91% return.

KARS

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -5.58%
• 6M: -5.36%
• YTD: -3.13%
• 1Y: 25.51%
• 3Y*: -3.57%
• 5Y*: -7.36%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.49%

XLII

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: -0.49%
• 6M: 8.98%
• YTD: 11.91%
• 1Y: 20.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF	$357.33K	$457.30K	$1.09M
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$449.50K	$324.22K	$213.70K

KARS vs. XLII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF	-3.13%	24.37%
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	11.91%	6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between KARS and XLII is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.37

KARS vs. XLII - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KARS	XLII
Consumer Cyclical	35.9%	0.3%
Basic Materials	25.4%	-
Industrials	20.7%	93.8%
Technology	18.0%	5.9%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	100.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KARS vs. XLII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KARS

KARS Risk / Return Rank: 34
KARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
KARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
KARS Omega Ratio Rank: 35
KARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
KARS Martin Ratio Rank: 33

XLII

XLII Risk / Return Rank: 66
XLII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
XLII Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
XLII Omega Ratio Rank: 69
XLII Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
XLII Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KARS vs. XLII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KARS	XLII	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	1.59	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	2.26	-0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.29	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	1.93	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.12	8.68	-5.55

KARS vs. XLII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KARS Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the XLII Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KARS and XLII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KARS vs. XLII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KARS drawdown since its inception was -64.85%, which is greater than XLII's maximum drawdown of -10.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KARS and XLII.

Drawdown Indicators

	KARS	XLII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.85%	-10.10%	-54.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.94%	-10.10%	-14.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.95%	-1.32%	-39.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.48%	-1.28%	-27.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.11%	2.24%	+5.87%

Volatility

KARS vs. XLII - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) has a higher volatility of 8.37% compared to State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) at 3.82%. This indicates that KARS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KARS	XLII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.37%	3.82%	+4.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.26%	10.44%	+11.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.30%	12.25%	+16.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.00%	12.23%	+17.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.40%	12.23%	+17.17%

KARS vs. XLII - Expense Ratio Comparison

KARS has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than XLII's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

KARS vs. XLII - Dividend Comparison

KARS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than XLII's 12.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF	0.19%	0.18%	0.78%	0.88%	1.13%	6.73%	0.14%	1.85%	1.38%
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	12.08%	5.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KARS and XLII in my portfolio?

KARS and XLII have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KARS or XLII?

KARS has higher volatility (8.37%) compared to XLII (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KARS dropped -64.85% vs XLII's -10.10%.

Which ETF is better, KARS or XLII?

On 1-year performance, KARS leads with 25.51% vs 20.71% for XLII. On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XLII has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KARS or XLII?

Over the 1-year period, KARS has performed better with a 25.51% return vs 20.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KARS or XLII?

XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KARS or XLII?

XLII has the higher dividend yield at 12.08%, compared with 0.19% for KARS.

What is the main difference between KARS and XLII?

KARS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XLII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for KARS and 0.35% for XLII.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.