KARS vs. IGF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KARS (KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - KARS tracks the Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index while IGF tracks the S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KARS returned -4.78%/yr vs 10.70%/yr for IGF. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KARS charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.

Performance

KARS vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KARS achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 9.67% return.

KARS

• 1D: -4.28%
• 1M: -9.61%
• YTD: 5.04%
• 6M: 4.08%
• 1Y: 49.48%
• 3Y*: 2.98%
• 5Y*: -4.78%
• 10Y*: —

IGF

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 9.67%
• 6M: 8.98%
• 1Y: 17.62%
• 3Y*: 16.78%
• 5Y*: 10.70%
• 10Y*: 8.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KARS vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF	5.04%	46.04%	-17.88%	-7.85%	-39.20%	24.11%	71.17%	34.66%	-28.04%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	9.67%	21.31%	14.81%	6.14%	-1.26%	11.57%	-6.50%	25.82%	-10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between KARS and IGF is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2018	0.49

The correlation between KARS and IGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KARS vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KARS	IGF
Consumer Cyclical	33.5%	-
Basic Materials	25.4%	-
Industrials	22.1%	40.6%
Technology	19.0%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	19.6%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	39.7%

Return for Risk

KARS vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KARS

KARS Risk / Return Rank: 58
KARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
KARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
KARS Omega Ratio Rank: 51
KARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
KARS Martin Ratio Rank: 64

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 53
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 49
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KARS vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KARS	IGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.68	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	2.39	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.30	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	3.02	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.99	8.52	+2.47

KARS vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KARS Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KARS and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KARS vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KARS drawdown since its inception was -64.85%, which is greater than IGF's maximum drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KARS and IGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	KARS	IGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.85%	-58.33%	-6.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.68%	-5.87%	-9.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.79%	-14.28%	-33.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.85%	-20.83%	-44.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.97%	-2.99%	-32.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.34%	-11.84%	-16.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.51%	2.07%	+2.44%

Volatility

KARS vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) has a higher volatility of 11.59% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.35%. This indicates that KARS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KARS	IGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.59%	3.35%	+8.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.33%	8.73%	+12.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.82%	10.56%	+17.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.09%	13.96%	+16.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.41%	16.73%	+12.68%

KARS vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

KARS has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

KARS vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

KARS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than IGF's 2.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	2.91%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF	0.17%	0.18%	0.78%	0.88%	1.13%	6.73%	0.14%	1.85%	1.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KARS and IGF in my portfolio?

KARS and IGF have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KARS or IGF?

KARS has higher volatility (11.59%) compared to IGF (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KARS dropped -64.85% vs IGF's -58.33%.

Which ETF is better, KARS or IGF?

On 5-year performance, IGF leads with 10.70% vs -4.78% for KARS. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KARS or IGF?

Over the 5-year period, IGF has performed better with a 10.70% return vs -4.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KARS or IGF?

IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KARS or IGF?

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 0.17% for KARS.

What is the main difference between KARS and IGF?

KARS tracks Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for KARS and 0.39% for IGF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KARS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.