JPFP vs. JMOM
JPFP (JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF) and JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JPFP is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while JMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. JPFP is actively managed, while JMOM is passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPFP charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JMOM.
Performance
JPFP vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JPFP
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMOM
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- 6M
- 16.31%
- YTD
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 24.75%
- 5Y*
- 14.79%
- 10Y*
- —
JPFP vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF | -1.76% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPFP and JMOM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPFP vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank
JPFP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JMOM
JPFP vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPFP | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPFP vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPFP drawdown since its inception was -6.04%, smaller than the maximum JMOM drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPFP and JMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPFP | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.04% | -34.31% | +28.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -4.43% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -6.26% | +3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.84% | — |
Volatility
JPFP vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPFP | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.27% | 16.04% | +3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 18.94% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 20.18% | -0.91% |
JPFP vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPFP has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPFP vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison
JPFP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.75% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% |
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPFP and JMOM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for JPFP.
JMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.00% for JPFP.
JPFP is categorized as Systematic Trend, while JMOM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for JPFP and 0.12% for JMOM.
Find the right allocation for JPFP and JMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer