JPFP vs. MFUT
JPFP (JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF) and MFUT (Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPFP charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for MFUT.
Performance
JPFP vs. MFUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JPFP
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFUT
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- 13.81%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 28.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPFP vs. MFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF | -2.76% |
MFUT Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF | -4.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPFP and MFUT is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPFP vs. MFUT — Risk / Return Rank
JPFP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MFUT
JPFP vs. MFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP) and Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF (MFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPFP | MFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPFP vs. MFUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPFP drawdown since its inception was -5.82%, smaller than the maximum MFUT drawdown of -29.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPFP and MFUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPFP | MFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -29.28% | +23.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.53% | -7.52% | +2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.33% | -16.28% | +13.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.07% | — |
Volatility
JPFP vs. MFUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPFP | MFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.47% | 15.05% | +7.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 13.49% | +8.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 13.49% | +8.98% |
JPFP vs. MFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPFP has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUT's 1.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPFP vs. MFUT - Dividend Comparison
Neither JPFP nor MFUT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFUT Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPFP and MFUT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPFP is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPFP is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.18% for MFUT.
JPFP and MFUT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for JPFP and 1.18% for MFUT.
Find the right allocation for JPFP and MFUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer