JPFP vs. MATE
JPFP (JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF) and MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JPFP is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while MATE is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Man Group. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPFP charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MATE.
Performance
JPFP vs. MATE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JPFP
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MATE
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- 12.55%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPFP vs. MATE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF | -4.11% |
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | -5.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPFP and MATE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPFP vs. MATE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPFP vs. MATE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPFP drawdown since its inception was -5.85%, smaller than the maximum MATE drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPFP and MATE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPFP | MATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -13.24% | +7.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.85% | -6.87% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.52% | -3.37% | +0.85% |
Volatility
JPFP vs. MATE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPFP | MATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.30% | 23.26% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 23.26% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 23.26% | -0.96% |
JPFP vs. MATE - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPFP has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than MATE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPFP vs. MATE - Dividend Comparison
Neither JPFP nor MATE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, JPFP and MATE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JPFP is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPFP is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.
JPFP and MATE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
JPFP is categorized as Systematic Trend, while MATE is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for JPFP and 0.97% for MATE.
Find the right allocation for JPFP and MATE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer