PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPFP vs. MATE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPFP vs. MATE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JPFP

1D
-1.38%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MATE

1D
-1.46%
1M
-5.28%
YTD
12.55%
6M
10.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPFP vs. MATE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JPFP and MATE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPFP vs. MATE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JPFP vs. MATE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPFP vs. MATE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPFP drawdown since its inception was -5.85%, smaller than the maximum MATE drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPFP and MATE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPFPMATEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-13.24%

+7.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.85%

-6.87%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-3.37%

+0.85%

Volatility

JPFP vs. MATE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPFPMATEDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.30%

23.26%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.30%

23.26%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.30%

23.26%

-0.96%

JPFP vs. MATE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPFP has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than MATE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPFP vs. MATE - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPFP nor MATE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JPFP and MATE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, JPFP is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPFP is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.

JPFP and MATE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

JPFP is categorized as Systematic Trend, while MATE is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for JPFP and 0.97% for MATE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPFP and MATE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer