JPFP vs. SDMF
JPFP (JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF) and SDMF (Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds. JPFP is actively managed, while SDMF is passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JPFP charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SDMF.
Performance
JPFP vs. SDMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JPFP
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDMF
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPFP vs. SDMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF | -2.76% |
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | -1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPFP and SDMF is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPFP vs. SDMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP) and Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPFP vs. SDMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPFP drawdown since its inception was -5.82%, smaller than the maximum SDMF drawdown of -6.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPFP and SDMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPFP | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -6.23% | +0.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.53% | -2.72% | -1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.33% | -2.18% | -0.15% |
Volatility
JPFP vs. SDMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPFP | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.47% | 13.16% | +9.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 13.16% | +9.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 13.16% | +9.31% |
JPFP vs. SDMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPFP has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SDMF's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPFP vs. SDMF - Dividend Comparison
Neither JPFP nor SDMF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JPFP and SDMF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SDMF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDMF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for JPFP.
JPFP and SDMF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for JPFP and 0.35% for SDMF.
Find the right allocation for JPFP and SDMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer